PLoS ONE (Jan 2023)

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision & utilisation of primary health care services in Goma, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kambia district, Sierra Leone & Masaka district, Uganda.

  • K Kasonia,
  • D Tindanbil,
  • J Kitonsa,
  • K Baisley,
  • F Zalwango,
  • L Enria,
  • A Mansaray,
  • M James,
  • Y Nije,
  • D Tetsa Tata,
  • B J Lawal,
  • A Drammeh,
  • B Lowe,
  • D Mukadi-Bamuleka,
  • S Mounier-Jack,
  • F Nakiyimba,
  • P Obady,
  • J Muhavi,
  • J S Bangura,
  • B Greenwood,
  • M Samai,
  • B Leigh,
  • D Watson-Jones,
  • H Kavunga-Membo,
  • E Ruzagira,
  • K E Gallagher

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286295
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 6
p. e0286295

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionThis study aimed to determine whether the COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on essential primary healthcare services at public primary healthcare facilities.MethodsThe number of weekly consultations for antenatal care (ANC), outpatient (OPD), immunisations (EPI), family planning (FP) and HIV services, between January 2018 and December 2020, were collected from 25 facilities in Masaka district, Uganda, 21 in Goma, and 29 in Kambia district, Sierra Leone. Negative binomial regression models accounting for clustering and season were used to analyse changes in activity levels between 2018, 2019 and 2020.ResultsIn Goma, we found no change in OPD, EPI or ANC consultations, FP was 17% lower in March-July 2020 compared to 2019, but this recovered by December 2020. New diagnoses of HIV were 34% lower throughout 2020 compared to 2019. In Sierra Leone, compared to the same periods in 2019, facilities had 18-29% fewer OPD consultations throughout 2020, and 27% fewer DTP3 doses in March-July 2020. There was no evidence of differences in other services. In Uganda there were 20-35% fewer under-5 OPD consultations, 21-66% fewer MCV1 doses, and 48-51% fewer new diagnoses of HIV throughout 2020, compared to 2019. There was no difference in the number of HPV doses delivered.ConclusionsThe level of disruption varied across the different settings and qualitatively appeared to correlate with the strength of lockdown measures and reported attitudes towards the risk posed by COVID-19. Mitigation strategies such as health communications campaigns and outreach services may be important to limit the impact of lockdowns on primary healthcare services.