Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (May 2020)

Results of a randomized, double-blind phase II clinical trial of NY-ESO-1 vaccine with ISCOMATRIX adjuvant versus ISCOMATRIX alone in participants with high-risk resected melanoma

  • John F Thompson,
  • Peter Hersey,
  • Michael Millward,
  • Paul Nathan,
  • Weisan Chen,
  • Ralph Venhaus,
  • Andreas Behren,
  • Cyril Fisher,
  • Jonathan S Cebon,
  • Martin Gore,
  • Ian D Davis,
  • Grant A McArthur,
  • Euan Walpole,
  • Mark Smithers,
  • Vincenzo Cerundolo,
  • P Rod Dunbar,
  • Duncan MacGregor,
  • Michael P N Findlay,
  • T R Jeffry Evans,
  • Jeremy Marsden,
  • Angus G Dalgleish,
  • Pippa G Corrie,
  • Marples Maria,
  • Margaret Brimble,
  • Geoff Williams,
  • Sintia Winkler,
  • Heather M Jackson,
  • Liliana Endo-Munoz,
  • Candani S A Tutuka,
  • Lloyd J Old,
  • Dennis Haack,
  • Eugene Maraskovsky

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2019-000410
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

Background To compare the clinical efficacy of New York Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma-1 (NY-ESO-1) vaccine with ISCOMATRIX adjuvant versus ISCOMATRIX alone in a randomized, double-blind phase II study in participants with fully resected melanoma at high risk of recurrence.Methods Participants with resected stage IIc, IIIb, IIIc and IV melanoma expressing NY-ESO-1 were randomized to treatment with three doses of NY-ESO-1/ISCOMATRIX or ISCOMATRIX adjuvant administered intramuscularly at 4-week intervals, followed by a further dose at 6 months. Primary endpoint was the proportion free of relapse at 18 months in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and two per-protocol populations. Secondary endpoints included relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), safety and NY-ESO-1 immunity.Results The ITT population comprised 110 participants, with 56 randomized to NY-ESO-1/ISCOMATRIX and 54 to ISCOMATRIX alone. No significant toxicities were observed. There were no differences between the study arms in relapses at 18 months or for median time to relapse; 139 vs 176 days (p=0.296), or relapse rate, 27 (48.2%) vs 26 (48.1%) (HR 0.913; 95% CI 0.402 to 2.231), respectively. RFS and OS were similar between the study arms. Vaccine recipients developed strong positive antibody responses to NY-ESO-1 (p≤0.0001) and NY-ESO-1-specific CD4+ and CD8+ responses. Biopsies following relapse did not demonstrate differences in NY-ESO-1 expression between the study populations although an exploratory study demonstrated reduced (NY-ESO-1)+/Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) class I+ double-positive cells in biopsies from vaccine recipients performed on relapse in 19 participants.Conclusions The vaccine was well tolerated, however, despite inducing antigen-specific immunity, it did not affect survival endpoints. Immune escape through the downregulation of NY-ESO-1 and/or HLA class I molecules on tumor may have contributed to relapse.