Revista Chilena de Obstetricia y Ginecología (Jan 2010)
VALIDEZ DE LA PRUEBA DE HISTERECTOMÍA VAGINAL EN PACIENTES CON INDICACIÓN DE VÍA ABDOMINAL MANDATORIA
Abstract
Objetivo: Evaluar la histerectomía vaginal en la resolución de patología uterina benigna, en casos que habitualmente se resuelven por histerectomía abdominal. Método: Estudio prospectivo en 68 pacientes sometidas a histerectomía vaginal en el Servicio de Ginecología del Hospital Claudio Vicuña, de San Antonio, entre junio de 2003 a junio de 2009. Son pacientes sin partos vaginales, algunas nuligestas, la mayoría con cicatrices de cesárea o historia de cirugía pélvica previa. Se separan en dos grupos, uno de dificultad moderada (DM) (útero móvil, vagina >2 dedos de diámetro, fondos de saco bien conformados) y otro de dificultad severa (DS) (útero fijo, vagina Objective: To assess vaginal hysterectomy in benign uterine pathology resolution in cases who are usually resolved by abdominal hysterectomy. Method: We studied, prospectively, 68 patients that were operated by vaginal hysterectomy between june 2003 to june 2009 in the Gynecology Service at Claudio Vicuña Hospital, San Antonio. Most of the patients have history of prior cesarean section or pelvic surgery, but no one has had vaginal deliveries, inclusive, some of them, have no history of previous pregnancies. The patients were separated into two groups, moderate difficulty (MD): composed by patients with uterus conserved motility, vagina >2 fingers diameter, well conserved cul de sac, and severe difficulty (SD): composed by patients with none uterine motility, vagina <2 fingers diameter or fat cul de sac. Results: We did not observed statistically signifcant differences in age, number of prior cesarean sections or pelvic surgeries, estimated uterine size, bladder injury, nor abdominal conversion, but there was significant differences in operative time and need of morcelation, being greater in SD patients. It is important to notice the absent of major and minor complications in 93% of the patients. Conclusion: Our results are meant to demystify the objections for vaginal route, including the patients with extreme difficulty.
