After publication of our article  we became aware that there were errors in Fig. 5b and Fig. 6c, namely that the immunofluorescence of EDU-positive cells of the CABLES1 transfection group in Fig. 5b (panel 2) and the cell cycle distribution of the combination group (treatment with the antimiR199a-3p and shRNA-CABLES1) in Fig. 6c (panel 3) were incorrectly presented.