Journal of Engineering (Jan 2023)

A Study on the Abrasion Resistance of Hydraulic Structures with Different Repair Mortars

  • Getinet Melesse,
  • Hibretu Kaske Kassa,
  • Minale Geta,
  • Tigist Simachew,
  • Tewodros Mamo,
  • Adal Mengesha,
  • Tegegn Asale

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3077902
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2023

Abstract

Read online

One of the main problems with hydraulic structures is that floating silt, gravel, ice sand, boulders, and other materials circulating over a concrete surface have an abrasive effect that causes hydraulic structures to abrade. Abrasion causes concrete to degrade, which could eventually expose the reinforcing to corrosion. In addition to section loss, reinforced concrete hydraulic structures’ endurance may also be a problem. Repair mortars are used to restore surfaces that have been abraded. The suitability of various repair materials for use as a repair layer on concrete surfaces is examined in this study. In order to apply different repair mortars to concrete specimens and subject them to abrasive forces, this work employs an experimental methodology. The ASTM C 1138 standard was followed for testing the abrasion resistance of the samples repaired using repair mortars underwater. Both silica fume mortar and polymer-modified mortar were employed in the study as forms of repair mortar. For each type of repair mortar, three cylindrical concrete specimens were cast, along with control specimens. Hence, nine cylindrical concrete samples in total were employed in this study. In order to quantify the effect of abrasion and, consequently, to assess the efficacy of various repair materials, abrasion volume loss was measured. Important findings about each type of repair material’s resistance to underwater abrasion are included in the study. The findings show that in terms of abrasion resistance underwater, the polymer-modified mortar performs better than the silica fume mortar.