Journal of Medical Internet Research (Jul 2023)

Patient Satisfaction With a Multisite, Multiregional Remote Patient Monitoring Program for Acute and Chronic Condition Management: Survey-Based Analysis

  • Tufia C Haddad,
  • Karla C Maita,
  • Jonathan W Inselman,
  • Francisco R Avila,
  • Ricardo A Torres-Guzman,
  • Jordan D Coffey,
  • Laura A Christopherson,
  • Angela M Leuenberger,
  • Sarah J Bell,
  • Dominick F Pahl,
  • John P Garcia,
  • Lukas Manka,
  • Antonio J Forte,
  • Michael J Maniaci

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/44528
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25
p. e44528

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundRemote patient monitoring (RPM) is an option for continuously managing the care of patients in the comfort of their homes or locations outside hospitals and clinics. Patient engagement with RPM programs is essential for achieving successful outcomes and high quality of care. When relying on technology to facilitate monitoring and shifting disease management to the home environment, it is important to understand the patients’ experiences to enable quality improvement. ObjectiveThis study aimed to describe patients’ experiences and overall satisfaction with an RPM program for acute and chronic conditions in a multisite, multiregional health care system. MethodsBetween January 1, 2021, and August 31, 2022, a patient experience survey was delivered via email to all patients enrolled in the RPM program. The survey encompassed 19 questions across 4 categories regarding comfort, equipment, communication, and overall experience, as well as 2 open-ended questions. Descriptive analysis of the survey response data was performed using frequency distribution and percentages. ResultsSurveys were sent to 8535 patients. The survey response rate was 37.16% (3172/8535) and the completion rate was 95.23% (3172/3331). Survey results indicated that 88.97% (2783/3128) of participants agreed or strongly agreed that the program helped them feel comfortable managing their health from home. Furthermore, 93.58% (2873/3070) were satisfied with the RPM program and ready to graduate when meeting the program goals. In addition, patient confidence in this model of care was confirmed by 92.76% (2846/3068) of the participants who would recommend RPM to people with similar conditions. There were no differences in ease of technology use according to age. Those with high school or less education were more likely to agree that the equipment and educational materials helped them feel more informed about their care plans than those with higher education levels. ConclusionsThis multisite, multiregional RPM program has become a reliable health care delivery model for the management of acute and chronic conditions outside hospitals and clinics. Program participants reported an excellent overall experience and a high level of satisfaction in managing their health from the comfort of their home environment.