PLoS ONE (Jan 2022)

Real-world assessment and treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma: Findings from the RegiSONIC disease registry.

  • Aleksandar Sekulic,
  • Simon Yoo,
  • Ragini Kudchadkar,
  • Julie Guillen,
  • Gary Rogers,
  • Anne Lynn S Chang,
  • Scott Guenthner,
  • Bernard Raskin,
  • Keith Dawson,
  • Yong Mun,
  • Laura Chu,
  • Edward McKenna,
  • Mario Lacouture

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262151
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 1
p. e0262151

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundLimited information is available regarding real-world treatment patterns and their effectiveness and safety in patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma, including patients not typically represented in clinical trials. The purpose of the current study was to describe how clinicians diagnose and treat locally advanced basal cell carcinoma in the United States.MethodsThis prospective, multicenter, observational registry study included patients with newly diagnosed, Hedgehog pathway inhibitor-naive locally advanced basal cell carcinoma without basal cell carcinoma nevus syndrome (n = 433) treated at 75 US academic and community practices, including dermatology, Mohs surgery, and medical oncology sites. The main outcomes of this study were treatment patterns and associated effectiveness and safety for patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma in real-world settings.ResultsDetermination of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma was mainly based on lesion size (79.6% of patients), histopathology (54.3%), extent of involvement (49.0%), and location (46.2%). Within 90 days of determination of locally advanced disease, 115 patients (26.6%) received vismodegib, 251 (58.0%) received surgery/other (non-vismodegib) treatment, and 67 (15.5%) had not yet received treatment (observation). Vismodegib-treated patients had a higher prevalence of high-risk clinical features predictive for locoregional recurrence than those with non-vismodegib treatment or observation. Clinical response rate was 85.1% with vismodegib and 94.9% with non-vismodegib treatment (primarily surgery). The most common adverse events with vismodegib were ageusia/dysgeusia, muscle spasms, alopecia, and weight loss. Rates of cutaneous squamous cell cancers were comparable between vismodegib and non-vismodegib treatment.ConclusionsThis prospective observational study offers insight on real-world practice, treatment selection, and outcomes for a nationally representative sample of US patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma. For patients with lesions that were not amenable to surgery, vismodegib treatment was associated with effectiveness and safety that was consistent with that observed in clinical trials.