Normative resistance to responsibility to protect in times of emerging multipolarity: the cases of Brazil and Russia

Abstract

Abstract This article assesses the normative resistance to Responsibility to Protect adopted by Brazil and Russia against the backdrop of their international identities and self-assigned roles in a changing global order. Drawing upon the framework of Bloomsfield’s norm dynamics role spectrum, it argues that while the ambiguous Russian role regarding this principle represents an example of ‘norm antipreneurship’, particularities of Brazil’s resistance are better grasped by a new category left unaccounted for by this model, which this study portrays as ‘contesting entrepreneur’.

Keywords

• Normative resistance
• Responsibility to protect
• Responsibility while protecting
• Brazilian foreign policy
• Russian foreign policy
• UN Security Council