Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (Feb 2021)
COMMENTS ON JACQUES’ “THE DIRECTIONALITY OF THE VOICING ALTERNATION IN TIBETAN”
Abstract
This response to Jacques’ paper (of this volume, JSEALS 14.1:32-38) suggests a revision of the temporal frame of the morphological processes discussed by Jacques. It agrees on the reconstructed sequence of derivation by means of a transitivising and voicing prefix that was followed by Schiefner’s law but dates both processes to stages in the history of the Trans-Himalayan family that preceded the formation of Proto-Tibetic.