BMC Research Notes (Sep 2012)

Re-challenge with pemetrexed in advanced mesothelioma: a multi-institutional experience

  • Bearz Alessandra,
  • Talamini Renato,
  • Rossoni Gilda,
  • Santo Antonio,
  • de Pangher Vincenzo,
  • Fasola Gianpiero,
  • Rosetti Francesco,
  • Favaretto Adolfo,
  • Gregorc Vanesa,
  • Berretta Massimiliano,
  • Santarossa Sandra,
  • Berto Eleonora,
  • Tirelli Umberto

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-482
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 1
p. 482

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Although first-line therapy for patients affected by advanced mesothelioma is well established, there is a lack of data regarding the impact of second-line treatment. Methods We retrospectively collected data of patients affected by advanced mesothelioma, already treated with first-line therapy based on pemetrexed and platin, with a response (partial response or stable disease) lasting at least 6 months, and re-treated with a pemetrexed-based therapy at progression. The primary objective was to describe time to progression and overall survival after re-treatment. Results Overall across several Italian oncological Institutions we found 30 patients affected by advanced mesothelioma, in progression after a 6-month lasting clinical benefit following a first-line treatment with cisplatin and pemetrexed, and re-challenged with a pemetrexed-based therapy. In these patients we found a disease control rate of 66%, with reduction of pain in 43% of patients. Overall time to progression and survival were promising for a second-line setting of patients with advanced mesothelioma, being 5.1 and 13.6 months, respectively. Conclusions In our opinion, when a patient has a long-lasting benefit from previous treatment with pemetrexed combined with a platin compound, the same treatment should be offered at progression.