JMIR Human Factors (Mar 2024)

Health Care Professionals’ Perspectives Before and After Use of eDialogue for Team-Based Digital Communication Across Settings: Qualitative Study

  • Lili Worre Høpfner Jensen,
  • Ole Rahbek,
  • Rikke Emilie Kildahl Lauritsen,
  • Søren Kold,
  • Birthe Dinesen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/53391
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11
p. e53391

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundOrthopedic surgical treatment is a transversal task that requires the active involvement of patients, relatives, and health care professionals (HCPs) across various settings. However, after hospital discharge, communication is challenged and undertaken primarily by phone. New digital communication solutions have the potential to create a space for seamless and patient-centered dialogue across discipline and sector boundaries. When evaluating new communication solutions, knowledge about HCPs’ needs and perspectives of use must be explored, as it is they who are responsible for implementing changes in practice. ObjectiveThis study aimed to (1) investigate HCPs’ perceptions of current communication pathways (phase 1) and (2) explore their experiences of using a simple messenger-like solution (eDialogue) for team-based digital communication across settings (phase 2). MethodsWe used a triangulation of qualitative data collection techniques, including document analysis, observations, focus groups, and individual interviews of HCPs before (n=28) and after (n=12) their use of eDialogue. Data collection and analysis were inspired by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to specifically understand facilitators and barriers to implementation as perceived by HCPs. ResultsHCPs perceive current communication pathways as insufficient for both patients and themselves. Phone calls are disruptive, and there is a lack of direct communication modalities when communication crosses sector boundaries. HCPs experienced the use of eDialogue as a quick and easy way for timely interdisciplinary interaction with patients and other HCPs across settings; however, concerns were raised about time consumption. ConclusionseDialogue can provide needed support for interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral patient-centered communication. However, future studies of this solution should address its impact and the use of resources.