Results in Engineering (Sep 2024)
Compaction behaviours of 17-4 PH, 316L, and 1.4551 stainless-steel powders during cold pressing
Abstract
Despite numerous recent technological developments, conventional powder metallurgy (CPM) remains the most commonly applied technique for fabricating stainless-steel products. However, the compressibility of stainless-steel powders is still a critical issue. Martensitic stainless-steel powders (i.e., 17-4 PH) are significantly harder than austenitic stainless-steel powders (i.e., 316L and 1.4551). Herein, three different stainless-steel (DSS) powders (i.e., 17-4 PH, 316L, and 1.4551) were investigated using a high cold pressing pressure (i.e., 1.6 GPa) and a relatively low sintering temperature of 1200 °C during CPM. Dimensional and Archimedes density measurements, volume and radial shrinkage calculations, optical and scanning electron microscopy analyses, and compressive strength measurements were conducted to investigate the physical and mechanical properties. Using 1.6 GPa resulted in a 10 % and 6 % increase in the relative green density of the 17-4 PH and 316L samples, compared with the reported literature. For the first time, relative sintering densities of approximately 97 % and 99 % were obtained for 316L and 1.4551 at a sintering temperature of 1200 °C, respectively. Despite the insufficient sintering process, the relative density of the 17-4 PH sample increased by 2 % compared with the literature values reported for higher sintering temperatures. The shrinkage ratios were much lower than those reported in the literature. Furthermore, the present 316L samples achieved 90 % of the compressive yield strength observed in cast 316L, a 25 % increase compared with that previously reported in the literature. This study extends the CPM procedure for enhancing green densities, employing low sintering temperatures, and reducing the shrinkage values of stainless-steel powders with differing hardness.
