Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy (Jul 2024)

Hypofractionated versus Conventional Postmastectomy Irradiation for Breast Cancer: Comparison of Acute Skin Toxicity

  • Wu Z,
  • Hou L,
  • Li C,
  • Li X,
  • Li Y

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 16
pp. 423 – 432

Abstract

Read online

Zhiyuan Wu,1,* Lili Hou,2,* Cheng Li,1,* Xiaohua Li,2 Ying Li1 1Department of Radio-Oncology, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Breast Surgery, Suzhou Wuzhong People’s Hospital, Suzhou, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this worksCorrespondence: Ying Li; Xiaohua Li, Email [email protected]; [email protected]: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality among women. Radiotherapy can reduce recurrence and prolong survival of patients accepting breast-conserving surgery (BCS). This study aims to compare acute skin reactions in patients receiving hypofractionated versus conventional radiotherapy at a single institution and to summarize the relevant influencing factors.Methods: This study analyzed 152 patients who underwent either hypofractionated or conventional whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after BCS. Acute skin toxicity was assessed according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. Predictive factors for acute skin toxicity were identified using multivariate analysis and visualized using a forest spot.Results: Grade 0 reactions occurred in 75.34% vs 70.89%, grade 1 in 16.44% vs 15.19%, grade 2 in 8.22% vs 12.66%, and grade 3 in 0% vs 1.27% of patients receiving hypofractionated and conventional WBI, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in acute skin reaction in patients treated with hypofractionated radiation compared with conventional radiation (P = 0.62). Multivariate analysis revealed that metastatic lymph nodes (P = 0.021), whole-breast planning target volume (PTV-WB) (P

Keywords