Journal of Medical Internet Research (Apr 2022)

Modeling Data Journeys to Inform the Digital Transformation of Kidney Transplant Services: Observational Study

  • Videha Sharma,
  • Iliada Eleftheriou,
  • Sabine N van der Veer,
  • Andrew Brass,
  • Titus Augustine,
  • John Ainsworth

DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/31825
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 4
p. e31825

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundData journey modeling is a methodology used to establish a high-level overview of information technology (IT) infrastructure in health care systems. It allows a better understanding of sociotechnical barriers and thus informs meaningful digital transformation. Kidney transplantation is a complex clinical service involving multiple specialists and providers. The referral pathway for a transplant requires the centralization of patient data across multiple IT solutions and health care organizations. At present, there is a poor understanding of the role of IT in this process, specifically regarding the management of patient data, clinical communication, and workflow support. ObjectiveTo apply data journey modeling to better understand interoperability, data access, and workflow requirements of a regional multicenter kidney transplant service. MethodsAn incremental methodology was used to develop the data journey model. This included review of service documents, domain expert interviews, and iterative modeling sessions. Results were analyzed based on the LOAD (landscape, organizations, actors, and data) framework to provide a meaningful assessment of current data management challenges and inform ways for IT to overcome these challenges. ResultsResults were presented as a diagram of the organizations (n=4), IT systems (n>9), actors (n>4), and data journeys (n=0) involved in the transplant referral pathway. The diagram revealed that all movement of data was dependent on actor interaction with IT systems and manual transcription of data into Microsoft Word (Microsoft, Inc) documents. Each actor had between 2 and 5 interactions with IT systems to capture all relevant data, a process that was reported to be time consuming and error prone. There was no interoperability within or across organizations, which led to delays as clinical teams manually transferred data, such as medical history and test results, via post or email. ConclusionsOverall, data journey modeling demonstrated that human actors, rather than IT systems, formed the central focus of data movement. The IT landscape did not complement this workflow and exerted a significant administrative burden on clinical teams. Based on this study, future solutions must consider regional interoperability and specialty-specific views of data to support multi-organizational clinical services such as transplantation.