Children (Feb 2023)

The Single and Combined Effects of Prenatal Nonchemical Stressors and Lead Exposure on Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Toddlers: Results from the CCREOH Environmental Epidemiologic Study in Suriname

  • Aloysius Ph. Koendjbiharie,
  • Ashna D. Hindori-Mohangoo,
  • Wilco C. W. R. Zijlmans,
  • Jeffrey K. Wickliffe,
  • Arti Shankar,
  • Hannah H. Covert,
  • Maureen Y. Lichtveld,
  • Antoon W. Grünberg,
  • Stacy S. Drury

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/children10020287
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 2
p. 287

Abstract

Read online

The primary aim of this prospective study was to examine the single and combined effect of prenatal exposure to perceived stress, probable depression, and lead on toddlers’ neurodevelopment using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, third edition. Data from 363 mother-toddler pairs enrolled in the Caribbean Consortium for Research in Environmental and Occupational Health prospective cohort study were analyzed. A prenatal lead exposure of ≥3.5 µg/dL was associated with significantly lower receptive (p = 0.008) and expressive (p = 0.006) communication scaled scores. Moderate and severe maternal prenatal probable depression scores were associated with significantly lower fine (p = 0.009) and gross (p = 0.009) motor scaled scores. However, a maternal report of prenatal stress was not associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes. After adjusting for maternal demographics, prenatal stress and lead exposure, prenatal probable depression remained predictive of the toddlers’ gross motor scaled scores (β −0.13, 95% CI [−0.24–−0.02]). Similarly, when adjusting for demographics, prenatal stress and probable depression, prenatal lead exposure remained a significant predictor of their receptive communication scaled scores (β −0.26, 95% CI [−0.49–−0.02]). An analysis testing combined exposure to perceived stress, probable depression, and lead exposure, measured using a cumulative risk index, significantly predicted the child fine motor scaled scores after adjusting for other covariates (β −0.74, 95% CI: [−1.41–−0.01]).

Keywords