BMJ Open (May 2023)

Evaluation of emergency care education and triage implementation: an observational study at a hospital in rural Liberia

  • Shada A Rouhani,
  • Regan H Marsh,
  • Rebecca Cook,
  • Ashley E Pickering,
  • Kathleen Towns,
  • Isaac Dolo,
  • Nicholas Ludmer,
  • Viola Karanja,
  • Minnie Horace,
  • Denny Dweh,
  • Tresa Dalieh,
  • Sharon Myers,
  • Alice Bukhman,
  • Jason Gashi,
  • Paul Sonenthal,
  • Patrick Ulysse

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067343
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 5

Abstract

Read online

Introduction In Liberia, emergency care is still in its early development. In 2019, two emergency care and triage education sessions were done at J. J. Dossen Hospital in Southeastern Liberia. The observational study objectives evaluated key process outcomes before and after the educational interventions.Methods Emergency department paper records from 1 February 2019 to 31 December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Simple descriptive statistics were used to describe patient demographics and χ2 analyses were used to test for significance. ORs were calculated for key predetermined process measures.Results There were 8222 patient visits recorded that were included in our analysis. Patients in the post-intervention 1 group had higher odds of having a documented full set of vital signs compared with the baseline group (16% vs 3.5%, OR: 5.4 (95% CI: 4.3 to 6.7)). After triage implementation, patients who were triaged were 16 times more likely to have a full set of vitals compared with those who were not triaged. Similarly, compared with the baseline group, patients in the post-intervention 1 group had higher odds of having a glucose documented if they presented with altered mental status or a neurologic complaint (37% vs 30%, OR: 1.7 (95% CI: 1.3 to 2.2)), documented antibiotic administration if they had a presumed bacterial infection (87% vs 35%, OR: 12.8 (95% CI: 8.8 to 17.1)), documented malaria test if presenting with fever (76% vs 61%, OR: 2.05 (95% CI: 1.37 to 3.08)) or documented repeat set of vitals if presenting with shock (25% vs 6.6%, OR: 8.85 (95% CI: 1.67 to 14.06)). There was no significant difference in the above process outcomes between the education interventions.Conclusion This study showed improvement in most process measures between the baseline and post-intervention 1 groups, benefits that persisted post-intervention 2, thus supporting the importance of short-course education interventions to durably improve facility-based care.