RMD Open (Feb 2024)

Defining criteria for disease activity states in juvenile dermatomyositis based on the Juvenile Dermatomyositis Activity Index

  • Carine Wouters,
  • Nicolino Ruperto,
  • Maria Trachana,
  • Angelo Ravelli,
  • Veronika Vargová,
  • Troels Herlin,
  • Angela Pistorio,
  • Pavla Dolezalova,
  • Claudia Bracaglia,
  • Alessandro Consolaro,
  • Silvia Rosina,
  • Ana Rebollo-Giménez,
  • Ana Guilaisne Bernard-Medina,
  • Laura Carenini

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003093
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

Objectives To develop and validate the cut-offs in the Juvenile DermatoMyositis Activity Index (JDMAI) to distinguish the states of inactive disease (ID), low disease activity (LDA), moderate disease activity (MDA) and high disease activity (HDA) in children with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM).Methods For cut-off definition, data from 139 patients included in a randomised clinical trial were used. Among the six versions of the JDMAI, JDMA1 (score range 0–40) and JDMAI2 (score range 0–39) were selected. Optimal cut-offs were determined against external criteria by calculating different percentiles of score distribution and through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. External criteria included the modified Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO) criteria for clinically ID in JDM (for ID) and PRINTO levels of improvement in the clinical trial (for LDA and HDA). MDA cut-offs were set at the score interval between LDA and HDA cut-offs. Cut-off validation was conducted by assessing construct and discriminative ability in two cohorts including a total of 488 JDM patients.Results The calculated JDMAI1 cut-offs were ≤2.4 for ID, ≤6.6 for LDA, 6.7–11 for MDA and >11 for HDA. The calculated JDMAI2 cut-offs were ≤5.2 for ID, ≤8.5 for LDA, 8.6–11.3 for MDA and >11.3 for HDA. The cut-offs discriminated strongly among disease activity states defined subjectively by caring physicians and parents, parents’ satisfaction or non-satisfaction with illness outcome, levels of pain, fatigue, physical functional impairment and physical well-being.Conclusions Both JDMAI1 and JDMAI2 cut-offs revealed good metrologic properties in validation analyses and are, therefore, suited for application in clinical practice and research.