Diagnostics (Jan 2023)

Diagnostic Ability of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Using 19-Gauge Fine-Needle Biopsy Needle for Abdominal Lesions

  • Kotaro Takeshita,
  • Susumu Hijioka,
  • Yoshikuni Nagashio,
  • Yuta Maruki,
  • Yuki Kawasaki,
  • Kosuke Maehara,
  • Yumi Murashima,
  • Mao Okada,
  • Go Ikeda,
  • Natsumi Yamada,
  • Tetsuro Takasaki,
  • Daiki Agarie,
  • Hidenobu Hara,
  • Yuya Hagiwara,
  • Kohei Okamoto,
  • Daiki Yamashige,
  • Akihiro Ohba,
  • Shunsuke Kondo,
  • Chigusa Morizane,
  • Hideki Ueno,
  • Yutaka Saito,
  • Yuichiro Ohe,
  • Takuji Okusaka

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030450
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 3
p. 450

Abstract

Read online

Attempts at performing endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) with a 19G needle are increasing because histological diagnosis and comprehensive genomic profiling are a necessity. However, the diagnostic ability of the 19G fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needle, especially the third-generation FNB needle, is unclear and has been retrospectively reviewed. The 19G TopGain needle was used in 147 patients and 160 lesions between September 2020 and December 2021. The technical success rate of the biopsies was 99.4% (159/160). The early adverse event rate was 4.1% (6/147), and moderate or severe adverse event rate occurrence was 2.0% (3/147). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the 19G TopGain needle for 157 lesions with a confirmed diagnosis were 96.7%, 100%, and 96.8%, respectively. Rescue EUS-TA using the 19G TopGain needle was performed for nine lesions, and a successful diagnosis was made in six of these lesions (66.7%). The diagnostic ability of EUS-TA using the third-generation 19G TopGain needle was favorable. However, the use of 19G FNB needles may increase adverse events. Therefore, EUS-TA with a 19G FNB needle is mainly indicated in lesions where comprehensive genomic profiling may be necessary or the diagnosis could not be determined via EUS-TA using the 22G needle.

Keywords