Local impedance-guided ablation and ultra-high density mapping versus conventional or contact force-guided ablation with mapping for treatment of cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter

Abstract

Introduction: – Local impedance (LI) guided ablation as a method of judging lesion effectiveness for cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter (CTI-AFL), and ultra-high density (UHD) mapping when breakthrough occurred across an ablation line has not previously been assessed. Methods: This retrospective observational study evaluated patients undergoing CTI-AFL ablation using conventional, contact force (CF) and LI guided strategies. Ablation metrics were collected, and in the LI cohort, the use of UHD mapping for breakthrough evaluated. Results: 30 patients were included, 10 per group. Mean total ablation time was significantly shorter with LI (3.2 ± 1.3min) vs conventional (5.6 ± 2.7min) and CF (5.7 ± 2.0min, p = 0.0042). Time from start of ablation to CTI block was numerically shorter with LI (14.2 ± 8.0min) vs conventional and CF (19.7 ± 14.1 and 22.5 ± 19.1min, p = 0.4408). Mean lesion duration was significantly shorter with LI, but there were no differences in the number of lesions required to achieve block, procedural success, complication rates or recurrence. 15/30 patients did not achieve block following first-pass ablation. UHD mapping rapidly identified breakthrough in the five LI patients, including epicardial-endocardial breakthrough (EEB). Conclusion: – The use of LI during ablation for real-time lesion assessment was as efficacious as the conventional and CF methods. UHD mapping rapidly identified breakthrough, including EEB.

Keywords

• Atrial flutter
• Ablation
• Local impedance
• Ultra-high density mapping