Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (May 2002)
Avaliação do Comprimento do Colo Uterino nas Posições Ortostática e Decúbito Horizontal nas Gestações Gemelares Uterine Cervical Length Evaluation in the Standing and Recumbent Positions in Twin Pregnancies
Abstract
Objetivo: avaliação ultra-sonográfica e comparação da medida do comprimento do colo uterino nas gestações gemelares com as pacientes nas posições de decúbito dorsal horizontal (DDH) e ortostática. Métodos: 50 gestações gemelares foram submetidas a avaliações ultra-sonográficas para medida do comprimento do colo uterino no período de maio de 1999 a dezembro de 2000. Os exames foram realizados pela via transvaginal com periodicidade de 4 semanas totalizando 136 avaliações. A cérvice uterina foi avaliada, segundo técnica normatizada, com a paciente nas posições de decúbito dorsal horizontal e ortostática. Resultados: as medidas do colo uterino nas posições DDH e ortostática na primeira avaliação apresentaram correlação inversa com a idade gestacional (DDH: r=-0,60; pPurpose: to compare cervical length measurements in twin pregnancies obtained by transvaginal ultrasound examination in the recumbent and standing positions. Methods: fifty twin pregnancies underwent transvaginal ultrasound examinations to measure the cervical length with the women in recumbent and standing positions. The study was carried out between May 1999 and December 2000. The scans were repeated every 4 weeks and the total number of evaluations was 136. Two groups were analyzed: one included only the first ultrasound examinations carried out in each woman and the second group included all evaluations. Results: in the first group, cervical length measurements in the standing and recumbent positions correlated inversely with the gestational age (recumbent: r=-0.60; p<0.001; standing: r=-0.46; p=0.008). The mean measure in the recumbent position was 35.2 mm (SD=9.9 mm) and 33.4 mm (SD=9.5 mm) in the standing position. When the difference between the measure obtained in the standing and recumbent positions was expressed as percentage of the measure in the recumbent position, there was no significant association with gestational age (p=0.07). When all evaluations were considered, there was a significant association between cervical length in the recumbent and standing positions (r=0.79; p<0.001). The measures in recumbent and standing positions were inversely correlated with gestational age (recumbent: p<0.0001; standing: p<0.0001). The mean cervical length in the recumbent position was 33.5 mm (SD=10.8 mm) and 31.8 mm (SD=9.6 mm) in the standing position. There was no significant association between cervical length difference expressed as percentage of the measure in the recumbent position and gestation. Conclusion: cervical length measure obtained with the patients in the recumbent and standing positions provided similar information.
Keywords
