Nutrients (Sep 2021)

Nutritional Intake, White Matter Integrity, and Neurodevelopment in Extremely Preterm Born Infants

  • Lisa M. Hortensius,
  • Els Janson,
  • Pauline E. van Beek,
  • Floris Groenendaal,
  • Nathalie H. P. Claessens,
  • Henriette F. N. Swanenburg de Veye,
  • Maria J. C. Eijsermans,
  • Corine Koopman-Esseboom,
  • Jeroen Dudink,
  • Ruurd M. van Elburg,
  • Manon J. N. L. Benders,
  • Maria Luisa Tataranno,
  • Niek E. van der Aa

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13103409
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 10
p. 3409

Abstract

Read online

Background: Determining optimal nutritional regimens in extremely preterm infants remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a new nutritional regimen and individual macronutrient intake on white matter integrity and neurodevelopmental outcome. Methods: Two retrospective cohorts of extremely preterm infants (gestational age n = 79) received a new nutritional regimen, with more rapidly increased, higher protein intake compared to cohort A (n = 99). Individual protein, lipid, and caloric intakes were calculated for the first 28 postnatal days. Diffusion tensor imaging was performed at term-equivalent age, and cognitive and motor development were evaluated at 2 years corrected age (CA) (Bayley-III-NL) and 5.9 years chronological age (WPPSI-III-NL, MABC-2-NL). Results: Compared to cohort A, infants in cohort B had significantly higher protein intake (3.4 g/kg/day vs. 2.7 g/kg/day) and higher fractional anisotropy (FA) in several white matter tracts but lower motor scores at 2 years CA (mean (SD) 103 (12) vs. 109 (12)). Higher protein intake was associated with higher FA and lower motor scores at 2 years CA (B = −6.7, p = 0.001). However, motor scores at 2 years CA were still within the normal range and differences were not sustained at 5.9 years. There were no significant associations with lipid or caloric intake. Conclusion: In extremely preterm born infants, postnatal protein intake seems important for white matter development but does not necessarily improve long-term cognitive and motor development.

Keywords