Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases (Jan 2024)

Dynamic monitoring of UBA1 somatic mutations in patients with relapsing polychondritis

  • Suying Duan,
  • Haiyang Luo,
  • Yunchao Wang,
  • Dongbin Jiang,
  • Jiajia Liu,
  • Jiaqi Li,
  • Honglin Zheng,
  • Taiqi Zhao,
  • Chenyang Liu,
  • Hang Zhang,
  • Chengyuan Mao,
  • Lei Zhang,
  • Yuming Xu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-023-03003-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Commonly clinically diagnosed with relapsing polychondritis (RP), vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic syndrome (VEXAS) is a recently identified autoinflammatory disease caused by UBA1 somatic mutations. The low frequency and dynamic changes challenge the accurate detection of somatic mutations. The present study monitored these mutations in Chinese patients with RP. We included 44 patients with RP. Sanger sequencing of UBA1 was performed using genomic DNA from peripheral blood. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) was performed to screen low-prevalence somatic variants. Results Multiple ddPCR detections were performed using available blood samples collected at different follow-up time points. Three male patients were UBA1 somatic mutation carriers. Sanger sequencing detected the somatic UBA1 variant c.122T > C (p.Met41Thr) in two male patients. Initial ddPCR confirmed the variant in the two patients, with allele fractions of 73.75% and 88.46%, respectively, while yielding negative results in other patients. Subsequent ddPCR detected the somatic variant (c.122T > C) with low prevalence (1.02%) in another male patient from blood samples collected at a different time point, and confirmed dynamically fractional abundance in one patient with VEXAS, with allele fractions of 73.75%, 61.28%, 65.01%, and 73.75%. Nine patients assessed by ddPCR at different time points remained negative. Conclusion We report UBA1 variants in patients with RP in the Chinese population for the first time. Multiple ddPCR detections from samples collected at different time points can enhance sensitivity and should be considered for patients with initial negative ddPCR results.

Keywords