Frontiers in Pharmacology (Apr 2024)

Drug-drug interactions with oral anticoagulants: information consistency assessment of three commonly used online drug interactions databases in Switzerland

  • Claire Coumau,
  • Claire Coumau,
  • Frederic Gaspar,
  • Frederic Gaspar,
  • Jean Terrier,
  • Jean Terrier,
  • Jean Terrier,
  • Angela Schulthess-Lisibach,
  • Monika Lutters,
  • Marie-Annick Le Pogam,
  • Chantal Csajka,
  • Chantal Csajka,
  • Chantal Csajka

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1332147
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15

Abstract

Read online

Background: Toxicity or treatment failure related to drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are known to significantly affect morbidity and hospitalization rates. Despite the availability of numerous databases for DDIs identification and management, their information often differs. Oral anticoagulants are deemed at risk of DDIs and a leading cause of adverse drug events, most of which being preventable. Although many databases include DDIs involving anticoagulants, none are specialized in them.Aim and method: This study aims to compare the DDIs information content of four direct oral anticoagulants and two vitamin K antagonists in three major DDI databases used in Switzerland: Lexi-Interact, Pharmavista, and MediQ. It evaluates the consistency of DDIs information in terms of differences in severity rating systems, mechanism of interaction, extraction and documentation processes and transparency.Results: This study revealed 2’496 DDIs for the six anticoagulants, with discrepant risk classifications. Only 13.2% of DDIs were common to all three databases. Overall concordance in risk classification (high, moderate, and low risk) was slight (Fleiss’ kappa = 0.131), while high-risk DDIs demonstrated a fair agreement (Fleiss’ kappa = 0.398). The nature and the mechanism of the DDIs were more consistent across databases. Qualitative assessments highlighted differences in the documentation process and transparency, and similarities for availability of risk classification and references.Discussion: This study highlights the discrepancies between three commonly used DDI databases and the inconsistency in how terminology is standardised and incorporated when classifying these DDIs. It also highlights the need for the creation of specialised tools for anticoagulant-related interactions.

Keywords