BJGP Open (Dec 2023)

GP preferences for, access to, and use of evidence in clinical practice: a mixed-methods study

  • Emer O’Brien,
  • Aisling Walsh,
  • Fiona Boland,
  • Claire Collins,
  • Velma Harkins,
  • Susan M Smith,
  • Noirin O’Herlihy,
  • Barbara Clyne,
  • Emma Wallace

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0107
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 4

Abstract

Read online

Background: GPs aim to provide patient-centred care combining clinical evidence, clinical judgement, and patient priorities. Despite a recognition of the need to translate evidence to support patient care, barriers exist to the use of evidence in practice. Aim: To ascertain the needs and preferences of GPs regarding evidence-based guidance to support patient care. The study also aimed to prioritise content and optimise structure and dissemination of future evidence-based guidance. Design & setting: This was a convergent parallel mixed-methods study in collaboration with the national GP professional body in the Republic of Ireland (Irish College of General Practitioners [ICGP]). Quantitative and qualitative findings were integrated at the interpretive level. Method: A national GP survey was administered via the ICGP (December 2020) and seven GP focus groups were undertaken (April–May 2021). Results: Of 3496 GPs, a total of 509 responders (14.6%) completed the survey and 40 GP participants took part in focus groups. Prescribing updates, interpretation of test results, chronic disease management, and older person care were the preferred topics for future evidence-based guidance. GPs reported that they required rapid access to up-to-date and relevant evidence summaries online for use in clinical practice. Access to more comprehensive reviews for the purposes of continuing education and teaching was also a priority. Multimodal forms of dissemination were preferred to increase uptake of evidence in practice. Conclusion: GPs indicated that rapid access to up-to-date, summarised evidence-based resources, available from their professional organisation, is preferred. Evidence should reflect the disease burden of the population and involve multifaceted dissemination approaches.

Keywords