PLoS ONE (Jan 2012)

Job strain and tobacco smoking: an individual-participant data meta-analysis of 166,130 adults in 15 European studies.

  • Katriina Heikkilä,
  • Solja T Nyberg,
  • Eleonor I Fransson,
  • Lars Alfredsson,
  • Dirk De Bacquer,
  • Jakob B Bjorner,
  • Sébastien Bonenfant,
  • Marianne Borritz,
  • Hermann Burr,
  • Els Clays,
  • Annalisa Casini,
  • Nico Dragano,
  • Raimund Erbel,
  • Goedele A Geuskens,
  • Marcel Goldberg,
  • Wendela E Hooftman,
  • Irene L Houtman,
  • Matti Joensuu,
  • Karl-Heinz Jöckel,
  • France Kittel,
  • Anders Knutsson,
  • Markku Koskenvuo,
  • Aki Koskinen,
  • Anne Kouvonen,
  • Constanze Leineweber,
  • Thorsten Lunau,
  • Ida E H Madsen,
  • Linda L Magnusson Hanson,
  • Michael G Marmot,
  • Martin L Nielsen,
  • Maria Nordin,
  • Jaana Pentti,
  • Paula Salo,
  • Reiner Rugulies,
  • Andrew Steptoe,
  • Johannes Siegrist,
  • Sakari Suominen,
  • Jussi Vahtera,
  • Marianna Virtanen,
  • Ari Väänänen,
  • Peter Westerholm,
  • Hugo Westerlund,
  • Marie Zins,
  • Töres Theorell,
  • Mark Hamer,
  • Jane E Ferrie,
  • Archana Singh-Manoux,
  • G David Batty,
  • Mika Kivimäki,
  • IPD-Work Consortium

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035463
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 7
p. e35463

Abstract

Read online

Tobacco smoking is a major contributor to the public health burden and healthcare costs worldwide, but the determinants of smoking behaviours are poorly understood. We conducted a large individual-participant meta-analysis to examine the extent to which work-related stress, operationalised as job strain, is associated with tobacco smoking in working adults.We analysed cross-sectional data from 15 European studies comprising 166,130 participants. Longitudinal data from six studies were used. Job strain and smoking were self-reported. Smoking was harmonised into three categories never, ex- and current. We modelled the cross-sectional associations using logistic regression and the results pooled in random effects meta-analyses. Mixed effects logistic regression was used to examine longitudinal associations. Of the 166,130 participants, 17% reported job strain, 42% were never smokers, 33% ex-smokers and 25% current smokers. In the analyses of the cross-sectional data, current smokers had higher odds of job strain than never-smokers (age, sex and socioeconomic position-adjusted odds ratio: 1.11, 95% confidence interval: 1.03, 1.18). Current smokers with job strain smoked, on average, three cigarettes per week more than current smokers without job strain. In the analyses of longitudinal data (1 to 9 years of follow-up), there was no clear evidence for longitudinal associations between job strain and taking up or quitting smoking.Our findings show that smokers are slightly more likely than non-smokers to report work-related stress. In addition, smokers who reported work stress smoked, on average, slightly more cigarettes than stress-free smokers.