Remote Sensing (Oct 2023)

Improving HJ-1B/IRS LST Retrieval of the Generalized Single-Channel Algorithm with Refined ERA5 Atmospheric Profile Database

  • Guoqin Zhang,
  • Dacheng Li,
  • Hua Li,
  • Zhaopeng Xu,
  • Zhiheng Hu,
  • Jian Zeng,
  • Yi Yang,
  • Hui Jia

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15215092
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 21
p. 5092

Abstract

Read online

Land surface temperature (LST) is a fundamental variable of environmental monitoring and surface equilibrium. Although the HJ-1B infrared scanner (IRS) has accumulated many observations, further application of HJ-1B/IRS is limited by the lack of LST products. This study refined the ERA5 atmospheric profile database, instead of the widely used traditional TIGR atmospheric profile database, and simulated the coefficients of the generalized single-channel (GSCs) algorithms to improve LST retrieval. GSCs can be divided into the GSCw and GSCwT algorithms, depending on whether the input is atmospheric water vapor content (WVC) or in situ near-surface air temperature and WVC. Land surface emissivity (LSE) was obtained from the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Global Emissivity Dataset (GED) and vegetation/snow cover products. Then, the retrieved LSTs were evaluated using the LSTs from the RTE algorithm, TIGRw/TIGRwT profiles, and in situ near-surface air temperature from the HiWATER experiment in China from 2012 to 2014. The bias (root mean square error (RMSE)) values are displayed as ERA5wT w wT w. The accuracy of ERA5wT, with a bias (RMSE) of 0.02 K (2.30 K), is higher than that of RTE, with a bias (RMSE) of 0.74 K (2.47 K). The accuracy of RTE is preferable to that of ERA5w, with a bias (RMSE) of 0.89 K (2.48 K), followed by TIGRwT, with a bias (RMSE) of −1.18 K (2.50 K), and then, TIGRw, with a bias (RMSE) of 1.60 K (2.77 K). In summary, the accuracy of LST obtained by GSC from the refined ERA5 atmospheric profiles is higher than that obtained from the TIGR profiles. The accuracy of LST obtained by GSCwT is greater than that obtained by GSCw. The accuracy of LST obtained using in situ near-surface air temperature is higher than that obtained using ERA5 air temperature. The accuracy of LSEASTER is slightly better than that of LSEMOD21. The aforementioned conclusions can provide scientific support to generate HJ-1B/IRS LST products.

Keywords