Frontiers in Psychology (Apr 2022)

Relationships Between Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction, Regulations, and Behavioral Engagement in Mathematics

  • Anders Hofverberg,
  • Anders Hofverberg,
  • Mikael Winberg,
  • Mikael Winberg,
  • Björn Palmberg,
  • Björn Palmberg,
  • Catarina Andersson,
  • Catarina Andersson,
  • Torulf Palm,
  • Torulf Palm

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.829958
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

Behavioral engagement is a key determinant of students’ learning. Hence, knowledge about mechanisms affecting engagement is crucial for educators and stakeholders. Self-determination theory (SDT) offers a framework to understand one of these mechanisms. However, extant studies mostly consider only parts of SDT’s theoretical paths from basic psychological need satisfaction via regulations to student engagement. Studies that investigate the full model are rare, especially in mathematics, and results are inconclusive. Moreover, constructs are often merged in ways that may preclude detailed understanding. In this study, we used structural equation modeling to test several hypothesized paths between the individual variables that make up higher-order constructs of need satisfaction, regulations, and behavioral engagement. Satisfaction of the need for competence had a dominating effect on engagement, both directly and via identified regulation. Similarly, satisfaction of the need for relatedness predicted identified regulation, that in turn predicted engagement. Satisfaction of the need for autonomy predicted intrinsic regulation as expected but, in contrast to theory, was also positively associated with controlled motivation (external and introjected regulation). Neither intrinsic nor controlled regulation predicted engagement. Theoretical and method-related reasons for this unexpected pattern are discussed, as well as implications for research and teaching.

Keywords