JTO Clinical and Research Reports (Mar 2020)

Development and Validation of a Simplified Prognostic Score in SCLC

  • Elodie Negre, MD,
  • Amandine Coffy, BSc,
  • Alexandra Langlais, BSc,
  • Jean-Pierre Daures, MD, PhD,
  • Armelle Lavole, MD,
  • Elisabeth Quoix, MD, PhD,
  • Olivier Molinier, MD,
  • Laurent Greillier, MD, PhD,
  • Clarisse Audigier-Valette, MD,
  • Denis Moro-Sibilot, MD, PhD,
  • Virginie Westeel, MD, PhD,
  • Franck Morin, PhD,
  • Benoît Roch, MD,
  • Jean-Louis Pujol, MD, PhD

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 1, no. 1
p. 100016

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: This study aimed at generating a new simplified prognostic score (SPS) using common clinical and biological variables to discriminate a limited number of subgroups of patients with SCLC differing by their overall survival (OS). Methods: The SPS was developed exploring the Montpellier University Hospital retrospective database of 401 patients over a 16-year period. All patients had received etoposide - platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment. The SPS development took into account significant determinants of OS in the Cox model, weighted by their regression β coefficients. Validation of the consequent SPS has been done separately in a combined population of 213 patients accrued from two different published trials (NCT03059667 and NCT00930891). Results: The significant independent determinants of OS included the following: (1) American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM stage IV (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.91–3.33); (2) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than 1 (HR: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.79–2.87); (3) the presence of liver metastases (HR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.29–2.15); and (4) neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio greater than 4 (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.11–1.92). The SPS generated with these four variables, segregated three groups (good, intermediate, and poor prognosis) with respective median OS of 26.9 months (95% CI: 20.1–38.9), 11.5 months (95% CI: 9.8–13.0), and 6.8 months (95% CI: 5.8–8.3; log-rank p < 10–4). Harrell's C statistic estimate was 0.68 ± 0.012, suggesting goodness of calibration. In the validation cohort, the SPS segregated the aforementioned three subgroups in a nearly similar manner, with respective median OS: 27.2, 12.3, and 8.6 months (log-rank p < 10–3; Harrell’s C statistic: 0.58 ± 0.02). Conclusions: The SPS is easy to calculate in real-life practice and efficiently discriminates three populations with different prognoses. This study deserves further validation of this score in patients with SCLC receiving immunochemotherapy.

Keywords