BMJ Open (Feb 2024)

Assessing trends and variability in outpatient dual testing for chronic kidney disease with urine albumin and serum creatinine, 2009–2018: a retrospective cohort study in the Veterans Health Administration System

  • Kara Zivin,
  • Meda E Pavkov,
  • Rajiv Saran,
  • Jennifer Bragg-Gresham,
  • Delphine Tuot,
  • Nicole M Bhave,
  • Yun Han,
  • Diane Steffick,
  • Nilka R Burrows,
  • Neil R Powe

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073136
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 2

Abstract

Read online

Background Simultaneous urine testing for albumin (UAlb) and serum creatinine (SCr), that is, ‘dual testing,’ is an accepted quality measure in the management of diabetes. As chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined by both UAlb and SCr testing, this approach could be more widely adopted in kidney care.Objective We assessed time trends and facility-level variation in the performance of outpatient dual testing in the integrated Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system.Design, subjects and main measures This retrospective cohort study included patients with any inpatient or outpatient visit to the VHA system during the period 2009–2018. Dual testing was defined as UAlb and SCr testing in the outpatient setting within a calendar year. We assessed time trends in dual testing by demographics, comorbidities, high-risk (eg, diabetes) specialty care and facilities. A generalised linear mixed-effects model was applied to explore individual and facility-level predictors of receiving dual testing.Key results We analysed data from approximately 6.9 million veterans per year. Dual testing increased, on average, from 17.4% to 21.2%, but varied substantially among VHA centres (0.3%–43.7% in 2018). Dual testing was strongly associated with diabetes (OR 10.4, 95% CI 10.3 to 10.5, p<0.0001) and not associated with VHA centre complexity level. However, among patients with high-risk conditions including diabetes, <50% received dual testing in any given year. As compared with white veterans, black veterans were less likely to be tested after adjusting for other individual and facility characteristics (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.93, p<0.0001).Conclusions Dual testing for CKD in high-risk specialties is increasing but remains low. This appears primarily due to low rates of testing for albuminuria. Promoting dual testing in high-risk patients will help to improve disease management and patient outcomes.