Journal of Translational Medicine (Mar 2023)

Tumor immune contexture predicts recurrence after prostatectomy and efficacy of androgen deprivation and immunotherapy in prostate cancer

  • Sujun Han,
  • Taoping Shi,
  • Yuchen Liao,
  • Dong Chen,
  • Feiya Yang,
  • Mingshuai Wang,
  • Jing Ma,
  • Hu Li,
  • Yu Xu,
  • Tengfei Zhu,
  • Wenxi Chen,
  • Guoqiang Wang,
  • Yusheng Han,
  • Chunwei Xu,
  • Wenxian Wang,
  • Shangli Cai,
  • Xu Zhang,
  • Nianzeng Xing

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03827-4
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men with notable interpatient heterogeneity. Implications of the immune microenvironment in predicting the biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) after radical prostatectomy and the efficacy of systemic therapies in prostate cancer remain ambiguous. Methods The tumor immune contexture score (TICS) involving eight immune contexture-related signatures was developed using seven cohorts of 1120 patients treated with radical prostatectomy (training: GSE46602, GSE54460, GSE70769, and GSE94767; validation: GSE70768, DKFZ2018, and TCGA). The association between the TICS and treatment efficacy was investigated in GSE111177 (androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) and EGAS00001004050 (ipilimumab). Results A high TICS was associated with prolonged BCRFS after radical prostatectomy in the training (HR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.24–0.45, P < 0.001) and the validation cohorts (HR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.32–0.62, P < 0.001). The TICS showed stable prognostic power independent of tumor stage, surgical margin, pre-treatment prostatic specific antigen (PSA), and Gleason score (multivariable HR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.39–0.63, P < 0.001). Adding the TICS into the prognostic model constructed using clinicopathological features significantly improved its 1/2/3/4/5-year area under curve (P < 0.05). A low TICS was associated with high homologous recombination deficiency scores, abnormally activated pathways concerning DNA replication, cell cycle, steroid hormone biosynthesis, and drug metabolism, and fewer tumor-infiltrating immune cells (P < 0.05). The patients with a high TICS had favorable BCRFS with ADT (HR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.06–0.99, P = 0.034) or ipilimumab monotherapy (HR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.06–0.81, P = 0.012). Conclusions Our study delineates the associations of tumor immune contexture with molecular features, recurrence after radical prostatectomy, and the efficacy of ADT and immunotherapy. The TICS may improve the existing risk stratification systems and serve as a patient-selection tool for ADT and immunotherapy in prostate cancer.

Keywords