PLoS ONE (Jan 2023)

Real-world utilization of SARS-CoV-2 serological testing in RNA positive patients across the United States.

  • Carla V Rodriguez-Watson,
  • Natalie E Sheils,
  • Anthony M Louder,
  • Elizabeth H Eldridge,
  • Nancy D Lin,
  • Benjamin D Pollock,
  • Jennifer L Gatz,
  • Shaun J Grannis,
  • Rohit Vashisht,
  • Kanwal Ghauri,
  • Gina Valo,
  • Aloka G Chakravarty,
  • Tamar Lasky,
  • Mary Jung,
  • Stephen L Lovell,
  • Jacqueline M Major,
  • Carly Kabelac,
  • Camille Knepper,
  • Sandy Leonard,
  • Peter J Embi,
  • William G Jenkinson,
  • Reyna Klesh,
  • Omai B Garner,
  • Ayan Patel,
  • Lisa Dahm,
  • Aiden Barin,
  • Dan M Cooper,
  • Tom Andriola,
  • Carrie L Byington,
  • Bridgit O Crews,
  • Atul J Butte,
  • Jeff Allen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281365
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 2
p. e0281365

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundAs diagnostic tests for COVID-19 were broadly deployed under Emergency Use Authorization, there emerged a need to understand the real-world utilization and performance of serological testing across the United States.MethodsSix health systems contributed electronic health records and/or claims data, jointly developed a master protocol, and used it to execute the analysis in parallel. We used descriptive statistics to examine demographic, clinical, and geographic characteristics of serology testing among patients with RNA positive for SARS-CoV-2.ResultsAcross datasets, we observed 930,669 individuals with positive RNA for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 35,806 (4%) were serotested within 90 days; 15% of which occurred 30%) in some datasets-limiting our ability to examine differences in serological testing by race. In datasets where race/ethnicity information was available, we observed a greater distribution of White individuals among those serotested; however, the time between RNA and serology tests appeared shorter in Black compared to White individuals. Test manufacturer data was available in half of the datasets contributing to the analysis.ConclusionOur results inform the underlying context of serotesting during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and differences observed between claims and EHR data sources-a critical first step to understanding the real-world accuracy of serological tests. Incomplete reporting of race/ethnicity data and a limited ability to link test manufacturer data, lab results, and clinical data challenge the ability to assess the real-world performance of SARS-CoV-2 tests in different contexts and the overall U.S. response to current and future disease pandemics.