BMC Urology (Aug 2021)

Computer-aided diagnosis with a convolutional neural network algorithm for automated detection of urinary tract stones on plain X-ray

  • Masaki Kobayashi,
  • Junichiro Ishioka,
  • Yoh Matsuoka,
  • Yuichi Fukuda,
  • Yusuke Kohno,
  • Keizo Kawano,
  • Shinji Morimoto,
  • Rie Muta,
  • Motohiro Fujiwara,
  • Naoko Kawamura,
  • Tetsuo Okuno,
  • Soichiro Yoshida,
  • Minato Yokoyama,
  • Rumi Suda,
  • Ryota Saiki,
  • Kenji Suzuki,
  • Itsuo Kumazawa,
  • Yasuhisa Fujii

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-021-00874-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Recent increased use of medical images induces further burden of their interpretation for physicians. A plain X-ray is a low-cost examination that has low-dose radiation exposure and high availability, although diagnosing urolithiasis using this method is not always easy. Since the advent of a convolutional neural network via deep learning in the 2000s, computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) has had a great impact on automatic image analysis in the urological field. The objective of our study was to develop a CAD system with deep learning architecture to detect urinary tract stones on a plain X-ray and to evaluate the model’s accuracy. Methods We collected plain X-ray images of 1017 patients with a radio-opaque upper urinary tract stone. X-ray images (n = 827 and 190) were used as the training and test data, respectively. We used a 17-layer Residual Network as a convolutional neural network architecture for patch-wise training. The training data were repeatedly used until the best model accuracy was achieved within 300 runs. The F score, which is a harmonic mean of the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) and represents the balance of the accuracy, was measured to evaluate the model’s accuracy. Results Using deep learning, we developed a CAD model that needed 110 ms to provide an answer for each X-ray image. The best F score was 0.752, and the sensitivity and PPV were 0.872 and 0.662, respectively. When limited to a proximal ureter stone, the sensitivity and PPV were 0.925 and 0.876, respectively, and they were the lowest at mid-ureter. Conclusion CAD of a plain X-ray may be a promising method to detect radio-opaque urinary tract stones with satisfactory sensitivity although the PPV could still be improved. The CAD model detects urinary tract stones quickly and automatically and has the potential to become a helpful screening modality especially for primary care physicians for diagnosing urolithiasis. Further study using a higher volume of data would improve the diagnostic performance of CAD models to detect urinary tract stones on a plain X-ray.

Keywords