PLoS ONE (Jan 2021)

Patient feedback surveys among pregnant women in Eswatini to improve antenatal care retention.

  • Chloe A Teasdale,
  • Amanda Geller,
  • Siphesihle Shongwe,
  • Arnold Mafukidze,
  • Michelle Choy,
  • Bhekinkhosi Magaula,
  • Katharine Yuengling,
  • Katherine King,
  • Eduarda Pimentel De Gusmao,
  • Caroline Ryan,
  • Trong Ao,
  • Tegan Callahan,
  • Surbhi Modi,
  • Elaine J Abrams

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248685
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 3
p. e0248685

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundUptake and retention in antenatal care (ANC) is critical for preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes for both mothers and infants.MethodsWe implemented a rapid quality improvement project to improve ANC retention at seven health facilities in Eswatini (October-December 2017). All pregnant women attending ANC visits were eligible to participate in anonymous tablet-based audio assisted computer self-interview (ACASI) surveys. The 24-question survey asked about women's interactions with health facility staff (HFS) (nurses, mentor mothers, receptionists and lab workers) with a three-level symbolic response options (agree/happy, neutral, disagree/sad). Women were asked to self-report HIV status. Survey results were shared with HFS at monthly quality improvement sessions. Chi-square tests were used to assess differences in responses between months one and three, and between HIV-positive and negative women. Routine medical record data were used to compare retention among pregnant women newly enrolled in ANC two periods, January-February 2017 ('pre-period') and January-February 2018 ('post-period') at two of the participating health facilities. Proportions of women retained at 3 and 6 months were compared using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel and Wilcoxon tests.ResultsA total of 1,483 surveys were completed by pregnant women attending ANC, of whom 508 (34.3%) self-reported to be HIV-positive. The only significant change in responses from month one to three was whether nurses listened with agreement increasing from 88.3% to 94.8% (pConclusionThe type of rapid quality improvement intervention we implemented may be useful in improving patient-provider relationships although whether it can improve retention remains unclear.