Protocol of BRICS: Brazilian multicentric pragmatic randomised trial of surgical interventions for displaced diaphyseal clavicle fracture study: MIPO versus ORIF for the treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures
Rafael Fuchs Lazarini,
Fabio Teruo Matsunaga,
João Carlos Belloti,
Marcel Jun Sugawara Tamaoki,
Oreste Lemos Carrazzone,
Adriano Fernando Mendes Jr.,
Rodrigo Fleury Curado,
Jair Moreira Dias Jr.,
José Da Mota Neto,
Alexandre Rosa Pagan,
Pedro José Labronici,
Gustavo José Labronici,
Matheus Pires De Araújo Goes,
Guilherme Grisi Mouraria,
Daniel Romano Zogbi,
Rafael Mulatti Brigatto,
Anderson Uehara,
Otávio Costa Parro,
Fernando Mitsuo Hisano,
Bruno De Souza Teixeira,
Rafael Waldolato Silva,
André Couto Godinho,
Pedro Couto Godinho,
Flavio De Oliveira França,
Glaydson Gomes Godinho,
José Marcio Alves Freitas,
Carlos Alberto Menezes Mariosa,
Bruno Gonçalves Schröder e Souza,
Valdeci Manoel De Oliveira,
Leandro Furtado De Simoni,
Camila Corrêa Pereira,
Jurandir Antunes Filho
Affiliations
Rafael Fuchs Lazarini
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Hospital Felicio Rocho, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Fabio Teruo Matsunaga
Department of Orthopedics and Escola Paulista de Medicina, UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil
João Carlos Belloti
Department of Orthopedics and Escola Paulista de Medicina, UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil
Marcel Jun Sugawara Tamaoki
Department of Orthopedics and Escola Paulista de Medicina, UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil
Oreste Lemos Carrazzone
Departamento de Ortopedia, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil
Adriano Fernando Mendes Jr.
Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora Hospital Universitário, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
Rodrigo Fleury Curado
Departamento de Ortopedia, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil
Jair Moreira Dias Jr.
Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora Hospital Universitário, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
José Da Mota Neto
Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora Hospital Universitário, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
Alexandre Rosa Pagan
Departamento de Ortopedia, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil
Pedro José Labronici
2 Department of Orthopaedics, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi, Brazil
Gustavo José Labronici
Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Santa Teresa, Petropolis, Brazil
Matheus Pires De Araújo Goes
Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Santa Teresa, Petropolis, Brazil
Guilherme Grisi Mouraria
Grupo de Cirurgia do Ombro e Cotovelo, UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil
Daniel Romano Zogbi
Grupo de Cirurgia do Ombro e Cotovelo, UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil
Rafael Mulatti Brigatto
Grupo de Cirurgia do Ombro e Cotovelo, UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil
Anderson Uehara
Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Santa Marcelina, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Otávio Costa Parro
Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Santa Marcelina, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Fernando Mitsuo Hisano
Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Santa Marcelina, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Bruno De Souza Teixeira
Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Universitario Ciencias Medicas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Rafael Waldolato Silva
Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Universitario Ciencias Medicas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
André Couto Godinho
Grupo de Cirurgia do Ombro dos Hospitais Belo Horizonte e LifeCenter, Hospital Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Pedro Couto Godinho
Grupo de Cirurgia do Ombro dos Hospitais Belo Horizonte e LifeCenter, Hospital Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Flavio De Oliveira França
Grupo de Cirurgia do Ombro dos Hospitais Belo Horizonte e LifeCenter, Hospital Lifecenter, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Glaydson Gomes Godinho
Grupo de Cirurgia do Ombro dos Hospitais Belo Horizonte e LifeCenter, Hospital Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
José Marcio Alves Freitas
Grupo de Cirurgia do Ombro dos Hospitais Belo Horizonte e LifeCenter, Hospital Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Carlos Alberto Menezes Mariosa
Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Maternidade Therezinha de Jesus, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
Bruno Gonçalves Schröder e Souza
Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Maternidade Therezinha de Jesus, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
Valdeci Manoel De Oliveira
Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Maternidade Therezinha de Jesus, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
Leandro Furtado De Simoni
Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Maternidade Therezinha de Jesus, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
Camila Corrêa Pereira
Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Monte Sinai, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
Jurandir Antunes Filho
Serviço de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora Hospital Universitário, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
Introduction Fractures of the diaphysis of the clavicle are common; however, treatment guidelines for this condition are lacking. Surgery is associated with a lower risk of non-union and better functional outcomes but a higher risk of complications. Open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws are the most commonly performed techniques, but they are associated with paraesthesia in the areas of incisions, extensive surgical exposure and high rates of implant removal. Minimally invasive techniques for treating these fractures have a lower rate of complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate which surgical treatment option (minimally invasive osteosynthesis or open reduction and internal fixation) has better prognosis in terms of complications and reoperations.Methods and analysis The study proposed is a multicentric, pragmatic, randomised, open-label, superiority clinical trial between minimally invasive osteosynthesis and open reduction and internal fixation for surgical treatment of patients with displaced fractures of the clavicle shaft. In the proposed study, 190 individuals with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures, who require surgery as treatment, will be randomised. The assessment will occur at 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 weeks, respectively. The primary outcome of the study will be the number of complications and reoperations. For sample size calculation, a moderate effective size between the techniques was considered in a two-tailed test, with 95% confidence and 90% power. Complications include cases of infection, hypertrophic scarring, non-union, refracture, implant failure, hypoesthesia, skin irritation and shoulder pain. Reoperations are defined as the number of surgeries for pseudoarthrosis, implant failure, infection and elective removal of the implant.Ethics and dissemination Study approved by the institutional ethics committee (number 34249120.9.0000.5505—V.3). The results will be disseminated by publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations in medical meetings.Trial registration number RBR-3czz68)/UTN U1111-1257-8953.