Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (Sep 2023)

Different states of stemness of glioblastoma stem cells sustain glioblastoma subtypes indicating novel clinical biomarkers and high-efficacy customized therapies

  • Alberto Visioli,
  • Nadia Trivieri,
  • Gandino Mencarelli,
  • Fabrizio Giani,
  • Massimiliano Copetti,
  • Orazio Palumbo,
  • Riccardo Pracella,
  • Maria Grazia Cariglia,
  • Chiara Barile,
  • Luigi Mischitelli,
  • Amata Amy Soriano,
  • Pietro Palumbo,
  • Federico Legnani,
  • Francesco DiMeco,
  • Leonardo Gorgoglione,
  • Graziano Pesole,
  • Angelo L. Vescovi,
  • Elena Binda

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-023-02811-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 42, no. 1
pp. 1 – 17

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant among gliomas with an inevitable lethal outcome. The elucidation of the physiology and regulation of this tumor is mandatory to unravel novel target and effective therapeutics. Emerging concepts show that the minor subset of glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) accounts for tumorigenicity, representing the true target for innovative therapies in GBM. Methods Here, we isolated and established functionally stable and steadily expanding GSCs lines from a large cohort of GBM patients. The molecular, functional and antigenic landscape of GBM tissues and their derivative GSCs was highlited in a side-by-side comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic characterization by ANOVA and Fisher’s exact tests. GSCs’ physio-pathological hallmarks were delineated by comparing over time in vitro and in vivo their expansion, self-renewal and tumorigenic ability with hierarchical linear models for repeated measurements and Kaplan–Meier method. Candidate biomarkers performance in discriminating GBM patients’ classification emerged by classification tree and patients’ survival analysis. Results Here, distinct biomarker signatures together with aberrant functional programs were shown to stratify GBM patients as well as their sibling GSCs population into TCGA clusters. Of importance, GSCs cells were demonstrated to fully resemble over time the molecular features of their patient of origin. Furthermore, we pointed out the existence of distinct GSCs subsets within GBM classification, inherently endowed with different self-renewal and tumorigenic potential. Particularly, classical GSCs were identified by more undifferentiated biological hallmarks, enhanced expansion and clonal capacity as compared to the more mature, relatively slow-propagating mesenchymal and proneural cells, likely endowed with a higher potential for infiltration either ex vivo or in vivo. Importantly, the combination of DCX and EGFR markers, selectively enriched among GSCs pools, almost exactly predicted GBM patients’ clusters together with their survival and drug response. Conclusions In this study we report that an inherent enrichment of distinct GSCs pools underpin the functional inter-cluster variances displayed by GBM patients. We uncover two selectively represented novel functional biomarkers capable of discriminating GBM patients’ stratification, survival and drug response, setting the stage for the determination of patient-tailored diagnostic and prognostic strategies and, mostly, for the design of appropriate, patient-selective treatment protocols.

Keywords