Heliyon (Sep 2024)
The modified exhaust method is used in open-heart surgery for cardiopulmonary bypass in children with congenital heart disease
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a modified exhaust method in pediatric open-heart surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass. Method: Data from 303 cases conducted at the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Guizhou Hospital, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, between October 2023 and March 2024 were analyzed. Among these cases, 202 utilized the modified exhaust method, divided into group A (101 cases with median thoracotomy) and group C (101 cases with lateral thoracotomy), while 101 cases used the traditional exhaust method in group B (median thoracotomy). Comparative analysis included general patient data, cardiopulmonary bypass duration, aortic cross-clamp time, time for exhaust and reperfusion upon opening, post-reperfusion ST segment abnormalities on electrocardiogram, intracardiac pneumogram observations via esophageal ultrasound, relevant plasma biochemical indexes on postoperative day one, postoperative drainage volume, duration of ventilator use, and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Results: There was no difference in between-group comparisons regarding age (27.98 ± 3.57 vs. 34.05 ± 3.96 months; P = 0.401) and weight (12.23 ± 0.55vs. 12.59 ± 0.70 Kg; P = 0.563). Longer Cardiopulmonary bypass times were observed in patients undergoing median thoracotomy than those undergoing lateral thoracotomy (group B: 108.47 ± 2.30 min vs. group C: 117.03 ± 2.82 min, P = 0.002; group A: 108.91 ± 2.63 min vs. group C: 117.03 ± 2.82 min, P = 0.035). Exhaust and rebound times after opening were significantly shorter in the modified exhaust-method group compared with the traditional-method group (Group A: 52.62 ± 1.39 s vs. Group B: 65.20 ± 1.49 s, P 0.05). Conclusions: The modified exhaust method demonstrates overall good immediate results in pediatric congenital heart surgery. It was superior to the traditional exhaust method in terms of reducing exhaust times and potentially minimizing the risk of local aortic injuries. Additionally, it appeared to be suitable for lateral thoracotomy surgery.
