Modelling effectiveness of PPE on aerosol exposure for healthcare workers during typical ENT procedures

Abstract

Background: Previous studies report environmental aerosolization with various endonasal procedures, but do not specifically measure intranasal levels of inhaled aerosolized particles in healthcare providers (HCP) performing such procedures. The purpose of this study is to measure the impact of various types of personal protective equipment (PPE) worn by HCP during a variety of office-based endonasal procedures. Methodology: Simulated sneeze and office-based procedures were performed in a test model and aerosol levels were quantified in the middle meatus of a simulated HCP model wearing various forms of PPE by using a laser diode-based particle counter. Endoscopic exam, balloon sinus dilation, suction and irrigation, simulated tissue resection with a microdebrider, and routine debridement procedures were evaluated. The aerosol levels were evaluated with and without the use of PPE to assess HCP aerosol exposure. Results: A simulated sneeze represents a worst-case aerosol generating event when compared to other common office-based procedures (approximately 1,000 times greater than baseline particle count). Common endoscopic procedures did not generate significantly greater particle counts above baseline. When compared to no mask, a surgical mask reduces particle counts experienced by HCP in the middle meatus by 69%, while an N95 mask significantly reduced particles by 93%. Conclusions: The levels of aerosols generated during common office-based procedures are consistent with the background aerosol levels measured at baseline. Masks are effective, with the N95 mask most effective at reducing HCP exposure to aerosols generated during a simulated sneeze.

Keywords

• covid-19
• personal protective equipment
• aerosolization
• balloon sinus dilation
• aerosol generating procedure