Research in Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging (Jun 2024)

Evaluation of a new beads reflux control microcatheter in drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization

  • Youssef Zaarour,
  • Haytham Derbel,
  • Charles Tran,
  • Laetitia Saccentia,
  • Benjamin Longère,
  • Maxime Blain,
  • Giuliana Amaddeo,
  • Alain Luciani,
  • Hicham Kobeiter,
  • Vania Tacher

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10
p. 100048

Abstract

Read online

Rationale and objectives: A new microcatheter was recently developed claiming to reduce beads reflux in drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE). The aim of this study was to compare the reflux control microcatheter ability versus a standard microcatheter for TACE treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Material and methods: Patients were prospectively included between November 2017 and February 2022. They received a DEB-TACE treatment with charged radiopaque beads using standard microcatheters or the SeQure reflux control microcatheter (Guerbet, France) and were assigned respectively to a control and a test group. Beads distribution mismatch was evaluated between the targeted territory on treatment planning CBCT and beads’ spontaneous opacities on the post-intervention CBCT and the 1-month CT scanner. Results: Twenty-three patients (21 men, median age 64 years [12.5 years]) with 37 hepatocellular carcinoma nodules were treated. The control group consisted of 13 patients – 19 nodules, while the test group included ten patients - 18 nodules. Non target embolization (NTE) was found in 20 % (2/10) of patients in the test group and 85 % (11/13) in the control group. NTE involved only an adjacent segment in the test group while it affected the adjacent biliary sector or even the contralateral liver lobe in the control group. No complication linked to NTE was found in the test group, while it led to one case of ischemic cholangitis and another case of biloma in the control group. Conclusion: The reflux control microcatheter may be efficient in reducing NTE and thus eventual adverse events in comparison to standard of care end-hole microcatheters.

Keywords