SAGE Open Medicine (Apr 2023)

SWOT analysis of a physical activity intervention delivered to outpatient adults with a mild traumatic brain injury

  • Christophe Alarie,
  • Isabelle Gagnon,
  • Lily Trang Thao Huynh,
  • Karine Doucet,
  • Adèle Pichette-Auray,
  • Cassandre Hinse-Joly,
  • Bonnie Swaine

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121231166638
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

Objectives: Physical activity interventions are effective to reduce the symptoms and recovery time after a mild traumatic brain injury; such interventions are not always embedded in all interdisciplinary outpatient settings. Service providers of a specialized rehabilitation program recognized the need to implement emerging evidence-based approaches to improve physical activity delivery. Understanding the perceptions of managers, clinicians, and users regarding the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of the current physical activity intervention delivered to outpatient adults with a mild traumatic brain injury could inform local and widespread intervention development, enhancement, and implementation of evidence-based physical activity interventions. Methods: This study used a descriptive qualitative design using a strength, weakness, opportunity, and threat analysis framework. Managerial staff ( n = 3), clinicians ( n = 6), and program users ( n = 5) with persisting symptoms following a mild traumatic brain injury from an outpatient specialized public rehabilitation program in Québec (Canada) participated. Individual semi-structured interviews were performed, recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a qualitative content analysis approach. Results: Participants were generally positive about the intervention but expressed that improvement was required. Strengths ( n = 15), weaknesses ( n = 17), opportunities ( n = 12), and threats ( n = 6) related to eight overarching categories: physical activity intervention, health-related outcomes, clinical expertise, knowledge translation, communication, user engagement, resources, and accessibility. Category descriptions, convergent and divergent perspectives, and salient quotes of participants are provided. Conclusions: Participants were generally positive about the intervention (e.g., format) but identified weaknesses (e.g., need for service providers to better describe the physical activity intervention using theoretically driven approaches). Consultations of stakeholders will inform future intervention enhancement efforts and assist in ensuring interventions meet user needs.