Finding “Pity” within the “Haggle and Nag” Rhetoric around Critical Race Theory

Abstract

This article identifies the challenges involving Critical Race Theory (CRT) in public discourse around the normalization of scholars’ language and rhetoric, while also providing fodder for the weaponization of CRT. Suggests an alternative approach for scholars to refocus CRT in public discourse through the fitting use of rhetorical frameworks. In Short · Anti-CRT discourse is rapidly being used to create public division and enact regressive policies and programs in the US. · Americans are increasingly weary of CRT due to opponents’ normalization of CRT scholarship and weaponization of CRT rhetoric, all which distorts the origins and intention of CRT. · Though scholars have lost some control of CRT public discourse, we can reassume stewardship of CRT through more patient and relatable rhetoric using frameworks such as those by Wayne Booth and Lloyd Bitzer.

Keywords

• critical race theory
• racism
• education policy
• rhetoric
• controversy
• us politics