HemaSphere (Jul 2023)

Radiation and Dose-densification of R-CHOP in Aggressive B-cell Lymphoma With Intermediate Prognosis: The UNFOLDER Study

  • Lorenz Thurner,
  • Marita Ziepert,
  • Christian Berdel,
  • Christian Schmidt,
  • Peter Borchmann,
  • Dominic Kaddu-Mulindwa,
  • Andreas Viardot,
  • Mathias Witzens-Harig,
  • Judith Dierlamm,
  • Mathias Haenel,
  • Bernd Metzner,
  • Gerald Wulf,
  • Eva Lengfelder,
  • Ulrich B. Keller,
  • Norbert Frickhofen,
  • Maike Nickelsen,
  • Tobias Gaska,
  • Frank Griesinger,
  • Rolf Mahlberg,
  • Reinhard Marks,
  • Ofer Shpilberg,
  • Hans-Walter Lindemann,
  • Martin Soekler,
  • Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal,
  • Michael Kiehl,
  • Eva Roemer,
  • Martin Bentz,
  • Beate Krammer-Steiner,
  • Ralf Trappe,
  • Peter de Nully Brown,
  • Massimo Federico,
  • Francesco Merli,
  • Marianne Engelhard,
  • Bertram Glass,
  • Norbert Schmitz,
  • Lorenz Truemper,
  • Moritz Bewarder,
  • Frank Hartmann,
  • Niels Murawski,
  • Stephan Stilgenbauer,
  • Andreas Rosenwald,
  • Bettina Altmann,
  • Heinz Schmidberger,
  • Jochen Fleckenstein,
  • Markus Loeffler,
  • Viola Poeschel,
  • Gerhard Held,
  • on behalf of German Lymphoma Alliance (GLA)

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000904
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 7
p. e904

Abstract

Read online

UNFOLDER (Unfavorable Young Low-Risk Densification of R-Chemo Regimens) is an international phase-3 trial in patients 18–60 years with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and intermediate prognosis defined by age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) of 0 and bulky disease (≥7.5 cm) or aaIPI of 1. In a 2 × 2 factorial design patients were randomized to 6× R-CHOP-14 or 6× R-CHOP-21 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prediso[lo]ne) and to consolidation radiotherapy to extralymphatic and bulky disease or observation. Response was assessed according to the standardized response criteria published in 1999, not including F-18 fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET). Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). A total of 695 of 700 patients were eligible for the intention-to-treat analysis. Totally 467 patients qualified for radiotherapy of whom 305 patients were randomized to receive radiotherapy (R-CHOP-21: 155; R-CHOP-14: 150) and 162 to observation (R-CHOP-21: 81, R-CHOP-14: 81). Two hundred twenty-eight patients not qualifying for radiotherapy were randomized for R-CHOP-14 versus R-CHOP-21. After a median observation of 66 months 3-year EFS was superior in the radiotherapy-arm versus observation-arm (84% versus 68%; P = 0.0012), due to a lower rate of partial responses (PR) (2% versus 11%). PR often triggered additional treatment, mostly radiotherapy. No significant difference was observed in progression-free survival (PFS) (89% versus 81%; P = 0.22) and overall survival (OS) (93% versus 93%; P = 0.51). Comparing R-CHOP-14 and R-CHOP-21 EFS, PFS and OS were not different. Patients randomized to radiotherapy had a superior EFS, largely due to a lower PR rate requiring less additional treatment (NCT00278408, EUDRACT 2005-005218-19).