Critical Care Explorations (Jan 2021)

Lung-Protective Ventilation Over 6 Years at a Large Academic Medical Center: An Evaluation of Trends, Adherence, and Perceptions of Benefit

  • Catherine A. Gao, MD,
  • Frederick M. Howard, MD,
  • Jonathan M. Siner, MD,
  • Thomas D. Candido, BA,
  • Lauren E. Ferrante, MD, MHS

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000325
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 1
p. e0325

Abstract

Read online

Objectives:. The main objective of this study was to evaluate trends in set tidal volumes across all adult ICUs at a large academic medical center over 6 years, with a focus on adherence to lung-protective ventilation (≤ 8-cc/kg ideal body weight). A secondary objective was to survey providers on their perceptions of lung-protective ventilation and barriers to its implementation. Design:. Retrospective observational analysis (primary objective) and cross-sectional survey study (secondary objective), both at a single center. Participants:. Mechanically ventilated adult patients with a set tidal volume (primary objective) and providers rotating through the Medical and Neurosciences ICUs (secondary objective). Interventions:. None. Measurements and Main results:. From 2013 to 2018, the average initial set tidal volume (cc/kg ideal body weight) decreased from 8.99 ± 2.19 to 7.45±1.34 (p < 0.001). The cardiothoracic ICU had the largest change in tidal volume from 11.09 ± 1.96 in 2013 to 7.97 ± 1.03 in 2018 (p < 0.001). Although the majority of tidal volumes across all ICUs were between 6.58 and 8.01 (interquartile range) in 2018, 27% of patients were still being ventilated at volumes greater than 8-cc/kg ideal body weight. Most surveyed respondents felt there was benefit to lung-protective ventilation, though many did not routinely calculate the set tidal volume in cc/kg ideal body weight, and most did not feel it was easily calculable with the current electronic medical record system. Conclusions:. Despite a trend toward lower tidal volumes over the years, in 2018, over a quarter of mechanically ventilated adult patients were being ventilated with tidal volumes greater than 8 cc/kg. Survey data indicate that despite respondents acknowledging the benefits of lung-protective ventilation, there are barriers to its optimal implementation. Future modifications of the electronic medical record, including a calculator to set tidal volume in cc/kg and the use of default set tidal volumes, may help facilitate the delivery of and adherence to lung-protective ventilation.