Settlement contract (solh) in term of transactions with an analysis from the perspective of Farîqayn (Shia and Sunni) jurisprudence and Iranian Law Looking at the law of Egypt and Iraq

Abstract

settlement contract in the capacity of transactions is one of the accepted types of settlement contract in Iran's civil law. The ease of using this contract in the society is one of the advantages of this contract, but there are disadvantages that can be pointed out as fraud and harming the third party, and the acceptance of this type of settlement contract is somewhat inconsistent with the philosophy of legalizing certain other contracts. The method of study and research is library. The jurisprudential sources and evidences of the legitimacy of the settlement contract in terms of transactions have been examined in the jurisprudence of the Farîqayn by looking at the law of Egypt and Iraq. It seems that the settlement agreement in terms of transactions does not have the truth of Sharia and removing this type of settlement agreement will not be against Sharia law and will block the way of abusing the law in this way.

Keywords

• settlement in the position of transactions
• shia jurisprudence
• sunni jurisprudence
• iranian law
• iraqi law
• egyptian law