Diagnostic pathways for breast cancer in 10 International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) jurisdictions: an international comparative cohort study based on questionnaire and registry data
,
David Weller,
Usha Menon,
Alina Zalounina Falborg,
Henry Jensen,
Andriana Barisic,
Anne Kari Knudsen,
David H Brewster,
Victoria Cairnduff,
Eva Grunfeld,
Elizabeth Harland,
Mats Lambe,
Rebecca-Jane Law,
Yulan Lin,
Martin Malmberg,
Donna Turner,
Richard D Neal,
Victoria White,
Samantha Harrison,
Peter Vedsted,
Una MacLeod,
Conan Donnelly,
Anna Gavin,
Jon Emery,
Oliver Bucher,
Jatinderpal Kalsi,
Chantelle Anandan,
Evangelia Ourania Fourkala,
Therese Kearney,
Marie-Louise Essink-Bot,
Sigrun Saur Almberg,
Breann Hawryluk,
Jacqueline Kelly,
Jackie Boylan,
Jan Willem Coebergh,
David Brewster,
Stefan Bergström,
Victoria Hammersley,
Rebecca Bergin,
Alina Zalounina Falborg,
Andriana Barisi,
Kerry Moore,
Maria Rejmyr Davis
Affiliations
Policy and Information, Cancer Research UK, London, UK
David Weller
General Practice, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Usha Menon
Women`s Cancer, University College London, London, UK
Alina Zalounina Falborg
Department of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark
Henry Jensen
Department of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark
Andriana Barisic
Renal Network, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Anne Kari Knudsen
David H Brewster
Victoria Cairnduff
Eva Grunfeld
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Elizabeth Harland
Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Mats Lambe
University Hospital, Regional Cancer Centre of Central Sweden, Uppsala, Sweden
Rebecca-Jane Law
North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
Yulan Lin
Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
Martin Malmberg
Department of Oncology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
Donna Turner
Population Oncology, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Richard D Neal
University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Victoria White
9 Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
Samantha Harrison
Policy and Information, Cancer Research UK, London, UK
Peter Vedsted
Department for Clinical Medicine, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Denmark
Una MacLeod
University of Hull, Hull, UK
Conan Donnelly
Anna Gavin
N Ireland Cancer Registry, Queen`s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
Jon Emery
Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
Oliver Bucher
Jatinderpal Kalsi
Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
Chantelle Anandan
Evangelia Ourania Fourkala
Therese Kearney
Marie-Louise Essink-Bot
1Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Objectives A growing body of evidence suggests longer time between symptom onset and start of treatment affects breast cancer prognosis. To explore this association, the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership Module 4 examined differences in breast cancer diagnostic pathways in 10 jurisdictions across Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK.Setting Primary care in 10 jurisdictions.Participant Data were collated from 3471 women aged >40 diagnosed for the first time with breast cancer and surveyed between 2013 and 2015. Data were supplemented by feedback from their primary care physicians (PCPs), cancer treatment specialists and available registry data.Primary and secondary outcome measures Patient, primary care, diagnostic and treatment intervals.Results Overall, 56% of women reported symptoms to primary care, with 66% first noticing lumps or breast changes. PCPs reported 77% presented with symptoms, of whom 81% were urgently referred with suspicion of cancer (ranging from 62% to 92%; Norway and Victoria). Ranges for median patient, primary care and diagnostic intervals (days) for symptomatic patients were 3–29 (Denmark and Sweden), 0–20 (seven jurisdictions and Ontario) and 8–29 (Denmark and Wales). Ranges for median treatment and total intervals (days) for all patients were 15–39 (Norway, Victoria and Manitoba) and 4–78 days (Sweden, Victoria and Ontario). The 10% longest waits ranged between 101 and 209 days (Sweden and Ontario).Conclusions Large international differences in breast cancer diagnostic pathways exist, suggesting some jurisdictions develop more effective strategies to optimise pathways and reduce time intervals. Targeted awareness interventions could also facilitate more timely diagnosis of breast cancer.