Environment International (Nov 2022)

Use of systematic evidence maps within the US environmental protection agency (EPA) integrated risk information system (IRIS) program: Advancements to date and looking ahead

  • Kristina A. Thayer,
  • Rachel M. Shaffer,
  • Michelle Angrish,
  • Xabier Arzuaga,
  • Laura M. Carlson,
  • Allen Davis,
  • Laura Dishaw,
  • Ingrid Druwe,
  • Catherine Gibbons,
  • Barbara Glenn,
  • Ryan Jones,
  • J. Phillip Kaiser,
  • Channa Keshava,
  • Nagalakshmi Keshava,
  • Andrew Kraft,
  • Lucina Lizarraga,
  • Kristan Markey,
  • Amanda Persad,
  • Elizabeth G Radke,
  • Glenn Rice,
  • Brittany Schulz,
  • Teresa Shannon,
  • Andrew Shapiro,
  • Shane Thacker,
  • Suryanarayana Vulimiri,
  • George Woodall,
  • Erin Yost

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 169
p. 107363

Abstract

Read online

Systematic evidence maps (SEMs) are increasingly used to inform decision-making and risk management priority-setting and to serve as problem formulation tools to refine the focus of questions that get addressed in full systematic reviews. Within the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Research and Development (ORD) Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), SEMs have been used to inform data gaps, determine the need for updated assessments, inform assessment priorities, and inform development of study evaluation considerations, among other uses. Increased utilization of SEMs across the environmental health field has the potential to increase transparency and efficiency for data gathering, problem formulation, read-across, and evidence surveillance. Use of the SEM templates published in the companion text (Thayer et al.) can promote harmonization in the environmental health community and create more opportunities for sharing extracted content.

Keywords