Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control (Nov 2021)

Infection prevention strategies are highly protective in COVID-19 units while main risks to healthcare professionals come from coworkers and the community

  • Shruti K. Gohil,
  • Kathleen A. Quan,
  • Keith M. Madey,
  • Suzanne King-Adelsohn,
  • Tom Tjoa,
  • Delia Tifrea,
  • Bridgit O. Crews,
  • Edwin S. Monuki,
  • Saahir Khan,
  • Sebastian D. Schubl,
  • Cassiana E. Bittencourt,
  • Neil Detweiler,
  • Wayne Chang,
  • Lynn Willis,
  • Usme Khusbu,
  • Antonella Saturno,
  • Sherif A. Rezk,
  • Cesar Figueroa,
  • Aarti Jain,
  • Rafael Assis,
  • Philip Felgner,
  • Robert Edwards,
  • Lanny Hsieh,
  • Donald Forthal,
  • William C. Wilson,
  • Michael J. Stamos,
  • Susan S. Huang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-01031-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Early evaluations of healthcare professional (HCP) COVID-19 risk occurred during insufficient personal protective equipment and disproportionate testing, contributing to perceptions of high patient-care related HCP risk. We evaluated HCP COVID-19 seropositivity after accounting for community factors and coworker outbreaks. Methods Prior to universal masking, we conducted a single-center retrospective cohort plus cross-sectional study. All HCP (1) seen by Occupational Health for COVID-like symptoms (regardless of test result) or assigned to (2) dedicated COVID-19 units, (3) units with a COVID-19 HCP outbreak, or (4) control units from 01/01/2020 to 04/15/2020 were offered serologic testing by an FDA-authorized assay plus a research assay against 67 respiratory viruses, including 11 SARS-CoV-2 antigens. Multivariable models assessed the association of demographics, job role, comorbidities, care of a COVID-19 patient, and geocoded socioeconomic status with positive serology. Results Of 654 participants, 87 (13.3%) were seropositive; among these 60.8% (N = 52) had never cared for a COVID-19 patient. Being male (OR 1.79, CI 1.05–3.04, p = 0.03), working in a unit with a HCP-outbreak unit (OR 2.21, CI 1.28–3.81, p < 0.01), living in a community with low owner-occupied housing (OR = 1.63, CI = 1.00–2.64, p = 0.05), and ethnically Latino (OR 2.10, CI 1.12–3.96, p = 0.02) were positively-associated with COVID-19 seropositivity, while working in dedicated COVID-19 units was negatively-associated (OR 0.53, CI = 0.30–0.94, p = 0.03). The research assay identified 25 additional seropositive individuals (78 [12%] vs. 53 [8%], p < 0.01). Conclusions Prior to universal masking, HCP COVID-19 risk was dominated by workplace and community exposures while working in a dedicated COVID-19 unit was protective, suggesting that infection prevention protocols prevent patient-to-HCP transmission. Article summary Prior to universal masking, HCP COVID-19 risk was dominated by workplace and community exposures while working in a dedicated COVID-19 unit was protective, suggesting that infection prevention protocols prevent patient-to-HCP transmission.

Keywords