BMC Bioinformatics (May 2024)

A comparison of RNA-Seq data preprocessing pipelines for transcriptomic predictions across independent studies

  • Richard Van,
  • Daniel Alvarez,
  • Travis Mize,
  • Sravani Gannavarapu,
  • Lohitha Chintham Reddy,
  • Fatma Nasoz,
  • Mira V. Han

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-024-05801-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 1
pp. 1 – 22

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background RNA sequencing combined with machine learning techniques has provided a modern approach to the molecular classification of cancer. Class predictors, reflecting the disease class, can be constructed for known tissue types using the gene expression measurements extracted from cancer patients. One challenge of current cancer predictors is that they often have suboptimal performance estimates when integrating molecular datasets generated from different labs. Often, the quality of the data is variable, procured differently, and contains unwanted noise hampering the ability of a predictive model to extract useful information. Data preprocessing methods can be applied in attempts to reduce these systematic variations and harmonize the datasets before they are used to build a machine learning model for resolving tissue of origins. Results We aimed to investigate the impact of data preprocessing steps—focusing on normalization, batch effect correction, and data scaling—through trial and comparison. Our goal was to improve the cross-study predictions of tissue of origin for common cancers on large-scale RNA-Seq datasets derived from thousands of patients and over a dozen tumor types. The results showed that the choice of data preprocessing operations affected the performance of the associated classifier models constructed for tissue of origin predictions in cancer. Conclusion By using TCGA as a training set and applying data preprocessing methods, we demonstrated that batch effect correction improved performance measured by weighted F1-score in resolving tissue of origin against an independent GTEx test dataset. On the other hand, the use of data preprocessing operations worsened classification performance when the independent test dataset was aggregated from separate studies in ICGC and GEO. Therefore, based on our findings with these publicly available large-scale RNA-Seq datasets, the application of data preprocessing techniques to a machine learning pipeline is not always appropriate.

Keywords