PLoS ONE (Jan 2020)

Delivery system can vary ventilatory parameters across multiple patients from a single source of mechanical ventilation.

  • Kyle K VanKoevering,
  • Pratyusha Yalamanchi,
  • Catherine T Haring,
  • Anne G Phillips,
  • Stephen Lewis Harvey,
  • Alvaro Rojas-Pena,
  • David A Zopf,
  • Glenn E Green

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243601
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 12
p. e0243601

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundCurrent limitations in the supply of ventilators during the Covid19 pandemic have limited respiratory support for patients with respiratory failure. Split ventilation allows a single ventilator to be used for more than one patient but is not practicable due to requirements for matched patient settings, risks of cross-contamination, harmful interference between patients and the inability to individualize ventilator support parameters. We hypothesized that a system could be developed to circumvent these limitations.Methods and findingsA novel delivery system was developed to allow individualized peak inspiratory pressure settings and PEEP using a pressure regulatory valve, developed de novo, and an inline PEEP 'booster'. One-way valves, filters, monitoring ports and wye splitters were assembled in-line to complete the system and achieve the design targets. This system was then tested to see if previously described limitations could be addressed. The system was investigated in mechanical and animal trials (ultimately with a pig and sheep concurrently ventilated from the same ventilator). The system demonstrated the ability to provide ventilation across clinically relevant scenarios including circuit occlusion, unmatched physiology, and a surgical procedure, while allowing significantly different pressures to be safely delivered to each animal for individualized support.ConclusionsIn settings of limited ventilator availability, systems can be developed to allow increased delivery of ventilator support to patients. This enables more rapid deployment of ventilator capacity under constraints of time, space and financial cost. These systems can be smaller, lighter, more readily stored and more rapidly deployable than ventilators. However, optimizing ventilator support for patients with individualized ventilation parameters will still be dependent upon ease of use and the availability of medical personnel.