Nutrients (Jul 2022)

Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Agents versus Bovine Colostrum Supplementation for the Management of Bone Health Using an Osteoporosis-Induced Rat Model

  • Eirini K. Kydonaki,
  • Laura Freitas,
  • Henrique Reguengo,
  • Carlos Raposo Simón,
  • Ana R. Bastos,
  • Emanuel M. Fernandes,
  • Raphaël F. Canadas,
  • Joaquim M. Oliveira,
  • Vitor M. Correlo,
  • Rui L. Reis,
  • Maria Vliora,
  • Paraskevi Gkiata,
  • Yiannis Koutedakis,
  • Georgia Ntina,
  • Rui Pinto,
  • Andres E. Carrillo,
  • Franklim Marques,
  • Tânia Amorim

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14142837
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 14
p. 2837

Abstract

Read online

Osteoporosis is defined by loss of bone mass and deteriorated bone microarchitecture. The present study compared the effects of available pharmacological and non-pharmacological agents for osteoporosis [alendronate (ALE) and concomitant supplementation of vitamin D (VD) and calcium (Ca)] with the effects of bovine colostrum (BC) supplementation in ovariectomized (OVX) and orchidectomized (ORX) rats. Seven-month-old rats were randomly allocated to: (1) placebo-control, (2) ALE group (7.5 μg/kg of body weight/day/5 times per week), (3) VD/Ca group (VD: 35 μg/kg of body weight/day/5 times per week; Ca: 13 mg/kg of body weight/day/3 times per week), and (4) BC supplementation (OVX: 1.5 g/day/5 times per week; ORX: 2 g/day/5 times per week). Following four months of supplementation, bone microarchitecture, strength and bone markers were evaluated. ALE group demonstrated significantly higher Ct.OV, Ct.BMC, Tb.Th, Tb.OV and Tb.BMC and significantly lower Ct.Pr, Tb.Pr, Tb.Sp, Ct.BMD and Tb.BMD, compared to placebo (p p p < 0.05). BC supplementation may induce positive effects on bone metabolism by stimulating bone formation, but appear not to be as effective as ALE.

Keywords