Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery (Sep 2021)

The fate of patients after failed epicardial ablation of atrial fibrillation

  • Giuseppe Nasso,
  • Roberto Lorusso,
  • Arash Motekallemi,
  • Angelo M. Dell’Aquila,
  • Nicola Di Bari,
  • Ignazio Condello,
  • Marco Moscarelli,
  • Saverio Iacopino,
  • Giuseppe F. Serraino,
  • Pasquale Mastroroberto,
  • Giuseppe Santarpino,
  • Giuseppe Speziale

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01635-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Much debate is still going on about the best ablation strategy—via endocardial or epicardial approach—in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and evidence gaps exist in current guidelines in this area. More specifically, there are no clear long-term outcome data after failed surgical AF ablation. Methods Since June 2008, 549 surgical AF ablation procedures through a right minithoracotomy were performed at our institution. From 2008 to 2011, a unipolar radiofrequency device was used (151 patients), whereas from 2011 to 2020 a bipolar radiofrequency device was used (398 patients). Patients were scheduled for surgery on the basis of the following criteria: recurrent episodes of paroxysmal or persistent lone AF refractory to maximally tolerated antiarrhythmic drug dosing and at least one failed cardioversion attempt. Besides the recommended follow-up by the local cardiologist, starting from 2021, surviving patients were asked to undergo assessment of left ventricular function and to complete a questionnaire addressing quality of life and predisposing factors for recurrent AF. Results At a mean follow-up of 77 months, the rate of AF recurrence was 20.7% (n = 114). On multivariate analysis, impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (58 patients, 51%, p = 0.002), worsening of European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) symptom class (37 patients, 32%, p = 0.003) and cognitive decline or depression (23 patients, 20%, p = 0.023) during follow-up were found to be significantly associated with AF recurrence. Conclusions Surgical AF ablation through a right minithoracotomy is safe, but a better outcome could be achieved using a hybrid approach. Patients after initial failed surgical AF ablation show worsening of cardiac function, clinical status and quality of life at follow-up compared to patients with successful AF ablation.

Keywords